ArticleCureus2023
Task-Specific Lingual Dystonia During Japanese Religious Services.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLingual dystonia is a subtype of oromandibular dystonia characterized by involuntary contractions of the tongue muscles, often provoked by speaking or eating.
methodsThis study reports six Japanese cases (four female and two male, mean age at onset of 49.5 years) with task-specific lingual dystonia during praying. In the early phase, all patients experienced lingual protrusion exclusively during Japanese religious services. When the patients start speaking, the tongues protrude forward, making it difficult to pronounce words. The patients were treated with multimodal treatment, including muscle afferent block (MAB) therapy comprising local anesthetic injection, botulinum toxin (onabotulinumtoxinA) injection, and a sensory trick splint.
resultsMAB therapy was conducted in five patients (mean time: 5.8), and botulinum toxin injection was administered in four patients (mean time: 8). The injected muscles were the genioglossal muscles and, in one case, the lateral pterygoid muscle. Sensory trick splints were inserted in three patients. After the multimodal therapy, the patients were able to pronounce words smoothly and clearly. Oromandibular Dystonia Rating Scale scores improved significantly (P<0.005) from baseline (187 points) to endpoint (47 points) with a mean follow-up of 4.7 years.
conclusionAlthough this entity is rare, medical and dental professionals should be aware of this peculiar symptom. Multimodal therapy is required to ensure effective treatment of praying-induced lingual dystonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.