ArticleHaematologica2024
Inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor CD22
Article in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for management of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- Targeted therapies in pediatric B-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: mechanisms, efficacy, and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparable outcomes after busulfan- or treosulfan-based conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL: results of FORUM.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Allogeneic HSCT outcomes and impact of defibrotide prophylaxis on SOS after inotuzumab in pediatric B-ALL.Blood advances · 2026Article
- [Evolving treatment landscape of pediatric acute leukemia: integration and breakthroughs in immunotherapy and targeted therapy].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- The quintessential role for CAR T cell therapy in children, adolescents and young adults with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Targeted therapies in pediatric oncology: A start.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Strategic Combinations of Antibody-Drug Conjugates from 2023 to 2025: From Dual Therapies to Innovative ADC-Based Regimens.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Overcoming resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: from mechanistic insights to cutting-edge strategies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- A Decade of Transformation in the Management of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: From Conventional Chemotherapy to Precision Medicine.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as a Bridge to Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Pediatric BCP-ALL After Tisagenlecleucel: A Case Series.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Combination low-intensity chemotherapy plus inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab and rituximab for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica · 2024Article
- PMDA regulatory update on approval and revision of the precautions for use of anticancer drugs; approval of elranatamab for multiple myeloma, CPX-351 for myeloid leukemia, inotuzumab ozogamicin for lymphoblastic leukemia, capivasertib for breast cancer, and zolbetuximab for gastric cancer in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: First Pediatric Approval.Paediatric drugs · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22-directed antibody conjugated with calicheamicin. The phase IB of the ITCC-059 trial tested InO combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Relapsed /refractory CD22+ BCP-ALL pediatric patients were enrolled. The primary objective was to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included preliminary efficacy and tolerability. InO was combined with 1.5 mg/m2 of vincristine (days 3, 10, 17, 24), 20 mg/m2 of dexamethasone (2 5-day blocks, then amended), and intrathecal therapy. A rolling-6 design was used testing InO from 0.8 to 1.8 mg/m2/cycle. Between May 2020 and April 2022, 30 patients were treated, and 29 were evaluable for dose limiting toxicities (DLT). At 1.1 mg/m2/cycle, two of four patients had DLT (liver toxicity). InO was de-escalated to 0.8 mg/m2/cycle (N=6) without DLT while awaiting a protocol amendment to reduce dexamethasone dose to 10 mg/m2. Post amendment, InO was re-escalated to 1.1 mg/m2/cycle (N=6, 1 DLT), then to 1.4 mg/m2/ cycle (N=3, no DLT), and finally to 1.8 mg/m2/cycle (N=7, 1 DLT). Three additional patients were treated in an expansion cohort. The pooled response rate was 80% (24/30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.4-92.3) and, among responders, 66.7% achieved minimal residual disease negativity. The RP2D of InO combined with vincristine, dexamethasone and intrathecal therapy was declared at 1.8 mg/m2/cycle (1.5 mg/m2/cycle after remission) in a fractioned schedule. This combination showed a response rate similar to the single agent cohorts of this trial, with liver toxicity issues at the initial higher dexamethasone dose (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NTR5736).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.