Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38186052›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2025

Patient positioning on the operating table and patient safety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Signe Berit Bentsen, Geir Egil Eide, Siri Wiig, Tone Rustøen, Cathrine Heen, Benedikte Bjøro

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Harmful incidents following gynaecological ambulatory surgery: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Signe Berit BentsenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-1247
Geir Egil EideDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Siri WiigDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Tone RustøenDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine HeenDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Operating Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Benedikte BjøroDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-275X
Oslo University Hospital · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify occurrence of harmful incidents related to patient positioning on operating table.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Eight databases including Ovid, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to August 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram depicting the flow information. REVIEW

methodsThe Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Risk of harm with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each included study, and an overall risk was calculated using meta-analysis.

resultsOf the 22 included reports, two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five had a prospective cohort design, three had a cross-sectional design, and 12 were register-based studies. Intraoperative peripheral nerve injuries, perioperative pressure ulcers, musculoskeletal injuries, vascular injuries, postoperative pain and eye injuries were related to supine, lithotomy, Trendelenburg, prone and beach chair positioning. Overall risk of any harm was estimated as 0.2%. Studies with patients placed in prone positioning (8 study samples) had the highest risks of harm varying from 0.19 to 0.81, with an overall risk of 0.33. Meta-analysis of the two RCTs showed higher risk of chemosis with head-down positioning than with head in neutral position (overall relative risk = 1.64; 95% CI: [1.25, 2.14]).

conclusionsHarmful incidents related to patient positioning occur and consequences can be severe. The operating room teams should be aware of the harms and prevent and treat them seriously. IMPACT: This review underlines that research is sparse on patient positioning on operating table and harmful incidents. There is a need for high-quality, well-designed studies that focus on harmful incidents and prevention of harm related to patient positioning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution, as this is a review of previous research.

Indexed as

Operating TablesPatient PositioningPatient SafetyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedadverse eventsharmful incidentsoperating roomoperating room nurseoperating room teampatient positioningpatient safetysystematic review; meta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID38186052
PMCPMC12371821
OpenAlexW4390667693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.