ArticleJournal of biosciences2024
Epidemiology: Gray immunity model gives qualitatively different predictions.
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compartmental models that dynamically divide the host population into categories such as susceptible, infected, and immune constitute the mainstream of epidemiological modelling. Effectively, such models treat infection and immunity as binary variables. We constructed an individual-based stochastic model that considers immunity as a continuous variable and incorporates factors that bring about small changes in immunity. The small immunity effects (SIE) comprise cross-immunity by other infections, small increments in immunity by subclinical exposures, and slow decay in the absence of repeated exposure. The model makes qualitatively different epidemiological predictions, including repeated waves without the need for new variants, dwarf peaks (peak and decline of a wave much before reaching herd immunity threshold), symmetry in upward and downward slopes of a wave, endemic state, new surges after variable and unpredictable gaps, and new surges after vaccinating majority of the population. In effect, the SIE model raises alternative possible causes of universally observed dwarf and symmetric peaks and repeated surges, observed particularly well during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also suggest testable predictions to differentiate between the alternative causes for repeated waves. The model further shows complex interactions of different interventions that can be synergistic as well as antagonistic. It also suggests that interventions that are beneficial in the short run could also be hazardous in the long run.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38186001W4390618887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.