Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38185652›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Demystifying anxiety and demotivation in on-line assessment: a focus on the impacts on academic buoyancy and autonomy.

Bai Li, Xin Yang, Sayed M Ismail, Asma Gheisari

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bai LiSchool of Foreign Languages, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, 211198, China.
Xin YangZhuhai Sports School, Zhuhai City, Guangdong, 519000, China. dengjifu57@gmail.com.
Sayed M IsmailDepartment of English Language, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6698-006X
Asma GheisariPayame Nour University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1708-0903

Funding

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University PSAU 2023 /R/1444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Test anxiety is a combination of a confluence of physiological hyperarousal, tension, and bodily manifestations, with apprehension, trepidation, fear of inadequacy, and the tendency to magnify negative outcomes, which manifest before or during evaluative assessments. Online evaluation might potentially exacerbate anxiety and demotivation among learners. When students' psychological and emotional well-being are taken into account, it may be possible to improve their educational and evaluative experiences. This study set out to shed light on the interplay between anxiety, demotivation, academic buoyancy, and autonomy in online assessment. To achieve this objective, printed copies of the related questionnaires were distributed among 392 EFL university students in China. The association between anxiety, demotivation, academic buoyancy, and autonomy in online assessment was assessed by data screening utilizing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings indicated that students who experienced less anxiety and demotivation were more buoyant and autonomous. Possible improvements in language education and assessment are considered, as are the study's broader implications.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersChinaEmotionsFearHumansAcademic buoyancyAnxiety in online assessmentAutonomyDemotivationEFL learners

Identifiers

PMID38185652
PMCPMC10773059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.