ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2024
Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics model can improve the detection of dense and sparse prostate cancers.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Assessment of Gestational Age in Accelerated Maturation, Delayed Maturation, Villous Edema, Chorangiosis, and Intrauterine Fetal Demise.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Placental Pathology: New Diagnostic Imaging Tools in Evolution and in Perspective.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Benchmarking pathology foundation models for non-neoplastic pathology in the placenta.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Using Variational Autoencoders for Out of Distribution Detection in Histological Multiple Instance Learning.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- Semi-quantitative scoring criteria based on multiple staining methods combined with machine learning to evaluate residual nuclei in decellularized matrix.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models are poised to transform surgical pathology practice. The most successful use attention mechanisms to examine whole slides, identify which areas of tissue are diagnostic, and use them to guide diagnosis. Tissue contaminants, such as floaters, represent unexpected tissue. Although human pathologists are extensively trained to consider and detect tissue contaminants, we examined their impact on ML models. We trained 4 whole-slide models. Three operate in placenta for the following functions: (1) detection of decidual arteriopathy, (2) estimation of gestational age, and (3) classification of macroscopic placental lesions. We also developed a model to detect prostate cancer in needle biopsies. We designed experiments wherein patches of contaminant tissue are randomly sampled from known slides and digitally added to patient slides and measured model performance. We measured the proportion of attention given to contaminants and examined the impact of contaminants in the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding feature space. Every model showed performance degradation in response to one or more tissue contaminants. Decidual arteriopathy detection--balanced accuracy decreased from 0.74 to 0.69 ± 0.01 with addition of 1 patch of prostate tissue for every 100 patches of placenta (1% contaminant). Bladder, added at 10% contaminant, raised the mean absolute error in estimating gestational age from 1.626 weeks to 2.371 ± 0.003 weeks. Blood, incorporated into placental sections, induced false-negative diagnoses of intervillous thrombi. Addition of bladder to prostate cancer needle biopsies induced false positives, a selection of high-attention patches, representing 0.033 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.