ReviewRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of atypical meningiomas with bone invasion: a retrospective analysis of nine cases and literature review.
Review in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comment on "Localized Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors and Indicators of Surgical Recurrence".Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeningiomas are the most common primary neoplasms of the central nervous system in adults, arising from the arachnoid cap cells. Thus, grade 2 meningiomas are situated on the border between benignity and malignancy. Among the many prognostic factors that have been investigated in these tumors, bone invasion is one of them.
objectiveThe aim of our study was to identify whether bone invasion influences tumor recurrence and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with atypical meningiomas (AMs). PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND
methodsOut of 81 patients with AMs followed over a period of five years, we identified nine patients with bone invasion. We analyzed their demographic, clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics, such as age, gender, radiological aspects, morphological features, extent of resection, recurrence rate, and PFS over a follow-up period of 60 months. Bone invasion was determined based on preoperative, surgical, and pathological reports.
resultsOut of the nine patients with bone invasion, four had convexity meningiomas, four had parasagittal meningiomas and one had a falcine meningioma. Regarding tumor recurrence∕progression, most patients (n=6) recurred within the first 24 months after surgery. Our study showed that the early recurrence/progression of tumor (at 12 months) correlated with extensive presence of malignancy criteria, especially with the presence of 15-18 mitoses∕10 high-power fields, as well as with large foci of spontaneous necrosis, but also with tumor bone infiltration, extensive bone lamellae destruction, and tumor infiltration of adjacent muscle with its atrophy due to tumor compression. Patients with bone invasion had a PFS of 29.3 months, compared to patients without invasion who had a higher PFS (49.3 months). Significant statistical associations were observed between bone invasion and tumor recurrence (p=0.002) and PFS (p=0.004).
conclusionsOur study emphasizes the importance of a thorough histopathological examination of the surgical specimen, which can provide significant data for the assessment of the progression of an AM [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2] with bone invasion. AM infiltration in adjacent bone and muscle increases the rate of tumor recurrence and decreases PFS over a follow-up period of 60 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.