Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184821›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2024

Chimeric antigens displaying GPR65 extracellular loops on a soluble scaffold enabled the discovery of antibodies, which recognized native receptor.

Janine Barrett, Seppe Leysen, Cécile Galmiche, Hussein Al-Mossawi, Paul Bowness, Thomas E Edwards, Alastair D G Lawson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Janine BarrettUK Research Department, UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-5984-4690
Seppe LeysenUK Research Department, UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.
Cécile GalmicheUK Research Department, UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.
Hussein Al-MossawiNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Paul BownessNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thomas E EdwardsUS Research Department, UCB Pharma, Bainbridge Island, WA, USA.
Alastair D G LawsonUK Research Department, UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUCB Pharma (United Kingdom) · GBUCB Pharma (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GPR65 is a proton-sensing G-protein coupled receptor associated with multiple immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, whose function is relatively poorly understood. With few reagents commercially available to probe the biology of receptor, generation of an anti-GPR65 monoclonal antibody was desired. Using soluble chimeric scaffolds, such as ApoE3, displaying the extracellular loops of GPR65, together with established phage display technology, native GPR65 loop-specific antibodies were identified. Phage-derived loop-binding antibodies recognized the wild-type native receptor to which they had not previously been exposed, generating confidence in the use of chimeric soluble proteins to act as efficient surrogates for membrane protein extracellular loop antigens. This technique provides promise for the rational design of chimeric antigens in facilitating the discovery of specific antibodies to GPCRs.

Indexed as

Cell Surface Display TechniquesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTechnologyReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledchimeric protein antigensGPCRGPR65monoclonal antibody generationphage display

Identifiers

PMID38184821
PMCPMC10773626
OpenAlexW4390650036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.