Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184755›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains.

Giacomo Bignardi, Dirk J A Smit, Edward A Vessel, MacKenzie D Trupp, Luca F Ticini, Simon E Fisher, Tinca J C Polderman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Giacomo BignardiLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. giacomo.bignardi@mpi.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7439-0684
Dirk J A SmitDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8301-8860
Edward A VesselMax Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-1731
MacKenzie D TruppDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luca F TiciniDepartment of Psychology, Webster Vienna Private University, Vienna, Austria.
Simon E FisherLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-1996
Tinca J C PoldermanClinical Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-301X
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCity College of New York · USMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Vienna · ATVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLWebster Vienna Private University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aesthetic values that individuals place on visual images are formed and shaped over a lifetime. However, whether the formation of visual aesthetic value is solely influenced by environmental exposure is still a matter of debate. Here, we considered differences in aesthetic value emerging across three visual domains: abstract images, scenes, and faces. We examined variability in two major dimensions of ordinary aesthetic experiences: taste-typicality and evaluation-bias. We build on two samples from the Australian Twin Registry where 1547 and 1231 monozygotic and dizygotic twins originally rated visual images belonging to the three domains. Genetic influences explained 26% to 41% of the variance in taste-typicality and evaluation-bias. Multivariate analyses showed that genetic effects were partially shared across visual domains. Results indicate that the heritability of major dimensions of aesthetic evaluations is comparable to that of other complex social traits, albeit lower than for other complex cognitive traits. The exception was taste-typicality for abstract images, for which we found only shared and unique environmental influences. Our study reveals that diverse sources of genetic and environmental variation influence the formation of aesthetic value across distinct visual domains and provides improved metrics to assess inter-individual differences in aesthetic value.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingEnvironmental ExposureAustraliaEstheticsHumansIndividuality

Identifiers

PMID38184755
PMCPMC10771521
OpenAlexW4390639898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.