ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhancing engineering optimization using hybrid sine cosine algorithm with Roulette wheel selection and opposition-based learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A synergistic enhancement of the Ivy algorithm for GAN-based imbalanced classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Opposition-based learning techniques in metaheuristics: classification, comparison, and convergence analysis.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Hybrid sine cosine and spotted Hyena based chimp optimization for PI controller tuning in microgrids.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- IRIME: Mitigating exploitation-exploration imbalance in RIME optimization for feature selection.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meta-heuristic algorithms distinguish themselves from conventional optimization methods owing to their intrinsic adaptability and straightforward implementation. Among them, the sine cosine algorithm (SCA) is lauded for its ability to transition seamlessly between exploration and exploitation phases throughout the optimization process. However, there exists potential for enhancing the balance that SCA maintains between exploration and exploitation. To augment the proficiency in global optimization of SCA, an innovative strategy-nSCA-that integrates the roulette wheel selection (RWS) with opposition-based learning was formulated. The robustness of nSCA was rigorously evaluated against leading-edge methods such as the genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization, moth-flame optimization, ant lion optimization, and multi-verse optimizer, as well as the foundational SCA. This evaluation included benchmarks set by both CEC 2019 and CEC 2021 test functions. Additionally, the performance of nSCA was confirmed through numerous practical optimization problems, emphasizing its effectiveness in applied settings. In all evaluations, nSCA consistently showcased superior performance compared to its evolutionary algorithm counterparts, delivering top-tier solutions for both benchmark functions and real-world optimization challenges. Given this compelling evidence, one can posit that nSCA serves as a strong candidate for addressing intricate optimization challenges found in real-world contexts, regardless of whether they are of a discrete or continuous nature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.