Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhancing engineering optimization using hybrid sine cosine algorithm with Roulette wheel selection and opposition-based learning.

Vu Hong Son Pham, Nghiep Trinh Nguyen Dang, Van Nam Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vu Hong Son PhamFaculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Vietnam National University (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nghiep Trinh Nguyen DangFaculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Vietnam National University (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. ndntrinh.sdh232@hcmut.edu.vn.
Van Nam NguyenFaculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Vietnam National University (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-heuristic algorithms distinguish themselves from conventional optimization methods owing to their intrinsic adaptability and straightforward implementation. Among them, the sine cosine algorithm (SCA) is lauded for its ability to transition seamlessly between exploration and exploitation phases throughout the optimization process. However, there exists potential for enhancing the balance that SCA maintains between exploration and exploitation. To augment the proficiency in global optimization of SCA, an innovative strategy-nSCA-that integrates the roulette wheel selection (RWS) with opposition-based learning was formulated. The robustness of nSCA was rigorously evaluated against leading-edge methods such as the genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization, moth-flame optimization, ant lion optimization, and multi-verse optimizer, as well as the foundational SCA. This evaluation included benchmarks set by both CEC 2019 and CEC 2021 test functions. Additionally, the performance of nSCA was confirmed through numerous practical optimization problems, emphasizing its effectiveness in applied settings. In all evaluations, nSCA consistently showcased superior performance compared to its evolutionary algorithm counterparts, delivering top-tier solutions for both benchmark functions and real-world optimization challenges. Given this compelling evidence, one can posit that nSCA serves as a strong candidate for addressing intricate optimization challenges found in real-world contexts, regardless of whether they are of a discrete or continuous nature.

Identifiers

PMID38184748
PMCPMC10771420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.