Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Clinical significance of preoperative CALLY index for prognostication in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing surgery.

Jifeng Feng, Liang Wang, Xun Yang, Qixun Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
32.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CALLY index as an independent predictor of pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jifeng FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Liang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qixun ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Chenqix@yeah.net.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index has been identified as a useful and sensitive predictive tool for stratification in cancers. This investigation aimed to validate the prognostic ability of CALLY in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Clinical characteristics of 318 patients with ESCC who underwent radical excision were gathered and analyzed retrospectively. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to determine an ideal threshold of CALLY due to the non-linear relation. To investigate the predictors, Cox hazard regression analysis was used. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), a method of risk categorization, was also developed for prognostic prediction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were used to distinguish from the traditional TNM stage. Patients were compared by groups according to the optimal threshold of CALLY index, which was depicted by the non-linear relation between the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and CALLY index (P < 0.0001). Compared to those with high CALLY index, patients with low CALLY index experienced significantly worse 5-year CSS (21.8% vs. 62.6%, P < 0.001). At different TNM stages, patients with high CALLY index also had better 5-year CSS (I: P = 0.029; II: P < 0.001; III: P < 0.001) in subgroup analyses. The hazard ratio for CSS was 0.368 and CALLY index was an independent predictive factor (P < 0.001). Using TNM stage and CALLY-based RPA algorithms, a new staging was created. The RPA model considerably outperformed the TNM classification for prognostication using ROC (P < 0.001). The DCA also demonstrated that the new model outperformed the TNM stage with significantly improved accuracy for CSS. The prognostic value of CALLY in ESCC undergoing radical resection was initially determined in this study. CALLY was substantially related to prognosis and might be utilized in conjunction with TNM to evaluate ESCC prior to surgery.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAlbuminsClinical RelevanceHumansRetrospective StudiesAlbumins

Identifiers

PMID38184747
PMCPMC10771508
OpenAlexW4390637265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.