Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184744›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

Cancer drug sensitivity prediction from routine histology images.

Muhammad Dawood, Quoc Dang Vu, Lawrence S Young, Kim Branson, Louise Jones, Nasir Rajpoot, Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad DawoodTissue Image Analytics Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Muhammad.Dawood@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-9478
Quoc Dang VuTissue Image Analytics Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Lawrence S YoungWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Kim BransonArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GlaxoSmithKline, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Louise JonesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Nasir RajpootTissue Image Analytics Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-1308
Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar MinhasTissue Image Analytics Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-1189

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline (GlaxoSmithKline plc.) PhD StudentshipInnovate UK PathLake Consortium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug sensitivity prediction models can aid in personalising cancer therapy, biomarker discovery, and drug design. Such models require survival data from randomised controlled trials which can be time consuming and expensive. In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate for the first time that deep learning can link histological patterns in whole slide images (WSIs) of Haematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stained breast cancer sections with drug sensitivities inferred from cell lines. We employ patient-wise drug sensitivities imputed from gene expression-based mapping of drug effects on cancer cell lines to train a deep learning model that predicts patients' sensitivity to multiple drugs from WSIs. We show that it is possible to use routine WSIs to predict the drug sensitivity profile of a cancer patient for a number of approved and experimental drugs. We also show that the proposed approach can identify cellular and histological patterns associated with drug sensitivity profiles of cancer patients.

Identifiers

PMID38184744
PMCPMC10771481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.