ArticleScientific reports2024
Acute ischemic stroke prediction and predictive factors analysis using hematological indicators in elderly hypertensives post-transient ischemic attack.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulse pressure after thrombectomy predicts functional outcomes and mortality in acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning approach to predict postoperative pain after spinal morphine administration during caesarean delivery.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Elderly hypertensive patients diagnosed with transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at a heightened risk for developing acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This underscores the critical need for effective risk prediction and identification of predictive factors. In our study, we utilized patient data from peripheral blood tests and clinical profiles within hospital information systems. These patients were followed for a three-year period to document incident AIS. Our cohort of 11,056 individuals was randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets in a 5:2:3 ratio. We developed an XGBoost model, developed using selected indicators, provides an effective and non-invasive method for predicting the risk of AIS in elderly hypertensive patients diagnosed with TIA. Impressively, this model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.9022, a recall of 0.8688, and a PR-AUC of 0.9315. Notably, our model effectively encapsulates essential data variations involving mixed nonlinear interactions, providing competitive performance against more complex models that incorporate a wider range of variables. Further, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the importance and sensitivity of each selected indicator and their interactions. This research equips clinicians with the necessary tools for more precise identification of high-risk individuals, thereby paving the way for more effective stroke prevention and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.