ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Epigenetic OCT4 regulatory network: stochastic analysis of cellular reprogramming.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stochastic modeling of epigenetic memory.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- BESTDR Enables Bayesian Quantification of Mechanism-Specific Drug Responses.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Role of frustrations in cell reprogramming.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Age reprogramming: Innovations and ethical considerations for prolonged longevity (Review).Biomedical reports · 2025Review
- Genetic and Epigenetic Interactions Involved in Senescence of Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that chromatin modifiers have a critical effect on cellular reprogramming, i.e., the conversion of differentiated cells to pluripotent stem cells. Here, we develop a model of the OCT4 gene regulatory network that includes genes expressing chromatin modifiers TET1 and JMJD2, and the chromatin modification circuit on which these modifiers act. We employ this model to compare three reprogramming approaches that have been considered in the literature with respect to reprogramming efficiency and latency variability. These approaches are overexpression of OCT4 alone, overexpression of OCT4 with TET1, and overexpression of OCT4 with JMJD2. Our results show more efficient and less variable reprogramming when also JMJD2 and TET1 are overexpressed, consistent with previous experimental data. Nevertheless, TET1 overexpression can lead to more efficient reprogramming compared to JMJD2 overexpression. This is the case when the recruitment of DNA methylation by H3K9me3 is weak and the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins are sufficiently scarce such that they do not hamper TET1 binding to methylated DNA. The model that we developed provides a mechanistic understanding of existing experimental results and is also a tool for designing optimized reprogramming approaches that combine overexpression of cell-fate specific transcription factors (TFs) with targeted recruitment of epigenetic modifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.