Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184661›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Diffusion-based generative AI for exploring transition states from 2D molecular graphs.

Seonghwan Kim, Jeheon Woo, Woo Youn Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptive Transition-State Refinement with Learned Equilibrium Flows.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 3DReact: Geometric Deep Learning for Chemical Reactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seonghwan Kim *Department of Chemistry, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, 34141, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9131-8864
Jeheon Woo *Department of Chemistry, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, 34141, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5532-3144
Woo Youn KimDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, 34141, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-2111

Funding

MOE | Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) RS202300219144National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2018R1A5A1025208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exploration of transition state (TS) geometries is crucial for elucidating chemical reaction mechanisms and modeling their kinetics. Recently, machine learning (ML) models have shown remarkable performance for prediction of TS geometries. However, they require 3D conformations of reactants and products often with their appropriate orientations as input, which demands substantial efforts and computational cost. Here, we propose a generative approach based on the stochastic diffusion method, namely TSDiff, for prediction of TS geometries just from 2D molecular graphs. TSDiff outperforms the existing ML models with 3D geometries in terms of both accuracy and efficiency. Moreover, it enables to sample various TS conformations, because it learns the distribution of TS geometries for diverse reactions in training. Thus, TSDiff finds more favorable reaction pathways with lower barrier heights than those in the reference database. These results demonstrate that TSDiff shows promising potential for an efficient and reliable TS exploration.

Identifiers

PMID38184661
PMCPMC10771475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.