Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184567›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of prednisolone and vitamin B1, B6, and B12 in patients with post-COVID-19-syndrome (PreVitaCOV) - protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in primary care (phase IIIb).

Caroline Tengelmann, Stefanie Joos, Yvonne Kaußner, Uwe Malzahn, Laura Lunden, Andreas Klug, Karl Georg Häusler, Catharina Escales, Walter Maetzler, Klemens Hügen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline Tengelmann *Department of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefanie Joos *Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Yvonne KaußnerDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Uwe MalzahnClinical Trial Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Laura LundenInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Michaelisstraße 5, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Andreas KlugDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Karl Georg HäuslerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building B1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Catharina EscalesInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Michaelisstraße 5, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Walter MaetzlerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller- Str. 3, Haus D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Klemens HügenClinical Trial Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Oliver ZolkInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Brandenburg Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Peter U HeuschmannClinical Trial Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian FörsterInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Christian.Foerster@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Hanna Kaduszkiewicz *Institute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Michaelisstraße 5, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Ildikó Gágyor *Department of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, Building D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEKiel University · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter infection with SARS-CoV-2 a relevant proportion of patients complains about persisting symptoms, a condition termed Post-COVID-19-syndrome (PC19S). So far, possible treatments are under investigation. Among others, neurotropic vitamins and anti-inflammatory substances are potential options. Thus, the PreVitaCOV trial aims to assess feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of treating patients in primary care with prednisolone and/or vitamin B1, B6 and B12.

methodsThe phase IIIb, multi-centre randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled PreVitaCOV trial has a factorial design and is planned as a two-phase approach. The pilot phase assessed feasibility and safety and was transformed into a confirmatory phase to evaluate effectiveness since feasibility was proven. Adult patients with PC19S after a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection at least 12 weeks ago are randomly assigned to 4 parallel treatments: prednisolone 20 mg for five days followed by 5 mg for 23 days (trial drug 1), B vitamins (B1 (100 mg OD), B6 (50 mg OD), and B12 (500 µg OD)) for 28 days (trial drug 2), trial drugs 1 and 2, or placebo. The primary outcome of the pilot phase was defined as the retention rate of the first 100 patients. Values of ≥ 85% were considered as confirmation of feasibility, this criterion was even surpassed by a retention rate of 98%. After transformation, the confirmatory phase proceeds by enrolling 240 additional patients. The primary outcome for the study is the change of symptom severity from baseline to day 28 as assessed by a tailored Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) total score referring to five symptom domains known to be typical for PC19S (fatigue, dyspnoea, cognition, anxiety, depression). The confirmatory trial is considered positive if superiority of any treatment is demonstrated over placebo operationalised by an improvement of at least 3 points on the PROMIS total score (t-score). DISCUSSION: The PreVitaCOV trial may contribute to the understanding of therapeutic approaches in PC19S in a primary care context.

trial registrationEudraCT: 2022-001041-20. DRKS: DRKS00029617. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: F001AM02222_1 (registered: 05 Dec 2022).

Indexed as

COVID-19ThiamineAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPrednisolonePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2SyndromeVitaminsPrednisoloneThiamineVitaminsPost-COVID-19-SyndromePrednisolonePrimary careRandomised controlled trialVitamin B

Identifiers

PMID38184567
PMCPMC10771676
OpenAlexW4390640458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.