Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184504›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Closed-loop anesthesia: foundations and applications in contemporary perioperative medicine.

Sean Coeckelenbergh, Sebastian Boelefahr, Brenton Alexander, Laurent Perrin, Joseph Rinehart, Alexandre Joosten, Luc Barvais

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Sedation and analgesia strategies in the neuro intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Goal-directed therapy: what is the goal again?Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sean CoeckelenberghDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France. sean.coeckelenbergh@gmail.com.
Sebastian BoelefahrDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Frankfurt University and Wuerzburg University Affiliated Academic Training Hospital, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Brenton AlexanderDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Laurent PerrinDepartment of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Joseph RinehartOutcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alexandre JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luc BarvaisDepartment of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A closed-loop automatically controls a variable using the principle of feedback. Automation within anesthesia typically aims to improve the stability of a controlled variable and reduce workload associated with simple repetitive tasks. This approach attempts to limit errors due to distractions or fatigue while simultaneously increasing compliance to evidence based perioperative protocols. The ultimate goal is to use these advantages over manual care to improve patient outcome. For more than twenty years, clinical studies in anesthesia have demonstrated the superiority of closed-loop systems compared to manual control for stabilizing a single variable, reducing practitioner workload, and safely administering therapies. This research has focused on various closed-loops that coupled inputs and outputs such as the processed electroencephalogram with propofol, blood pressure with vasopressors, and dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness with fluid therapy. Recently, multiple simultaneous independent closed-loop systems have been tested in practice and one study has demonstrated a clinical benefit on postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Despite their advantages, these tools still require that a well-trained practitioner maintains situation awareness, understands how closed-loop systems react to each variable, and is ready to retake control if the closed-loop systems fail. In the future, multiple input multiple output closed-loop systems will control anesthetic, fluid and vasopressor titration and may perhaps integrate other key systems, such as the anesthesia machine. Human supervision will nonetheless always be indispensable as situation awareness, communication, and prediction of events remain irreplaceable human factors.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyPerioperative MedicinePropofolBlood PressureHumansPropofol

Identifiers

PMID38184504
OpenAlexW4390635752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.