Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184488›Full record

ArticleHuman cell2024

Characterization of residual cancer by comparison of a pair of organoids established from a patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Takafumi Fuchino, Shusaku Kurogi, Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto, Tomotaka Shibata, Shoichi Fumoto, Hajime Fujishima, Keisuke Kinoshita, Yuka Hirashita, Masahide Fukuda, Chisato Nakada and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takafumi Fuchino *Department of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Shusaku Kurogi *Department of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Yoshiyuki TsukamotoDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan. tuka@oita-u.ac.jp.
Tomotaka ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Shoichi FumotoDepartment of Surgery, Oita Nakamura Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Hajime FujishimaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Keisuke KinoshitaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Yuka HirashitaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Masahide FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Chisato NakadaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Yusuke ItaiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Kosuke SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Tomohisa UchidaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Hidefumi ShiroshitaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Takashi MatsumotoDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Yoshio YamaokaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Koshiro TsutsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Kensuke FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Ryo OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Kazuhiro MizukamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Masaaki KodamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Masafumi InomataDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Kazunari MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Masatsugu MoriyamaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Naoki HijiyaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Oita University · JPNakamura Memorial Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20K07394Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP21H02703Oita University President's Strategic Discretionary Fund 2022Oita University President's Strategic Discretionary Fund 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is a standard approach for management of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients who do not respond well to NAC have a poor prognosis. Despite extensive research, the mechanisms of chemoresistance in ESCC remain largely unknown. Here, we established paired tumor organoids-designated as PreNAC-O and PostNAC-O-from one ESCC patient before and after NAC, respectively. Although the two organoids did not exhibit significant differences in proliferation, morphology or drug sensitivity in vitro, the tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O in vivo was significantly higher than that of PreNAC-O. Xenografts from PreNAC-O tended to exhibit keratinization, while those from PostNAC-O displayed conspicuous necrotic areas. The tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O xenografts during the chemotherapy was comparable to that of PreNAC-O without treatment. Furthermore, the gene expression profiles of the xenografts suggested that expression of genes involved in the EMT and/or hypoxia response might be related to the tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O. Our data suggested that the tumorigenicity of residual cancer had been enhanced, outweighing the effects of chemotherapy, rather than being attributable to intrinsic chemoresistance. Further studies are required to clarify the extent to which residual cancers share a common mechanism similar to that revealed here.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualOrganoidsChemotherapyEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaOrganoidResidual cancerResistance

Identifiers

PMID38184488
OpenAlexW4390640667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.