ArticleJournal of virological methods2024
Quantification of low-level human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia by digital PCR.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Active Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infections and Patient Reported Fatigue in Ovarian Cancer Survivors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- A single-center retrospective analysis of serological and molecular findings in patients infected with Epstein-Barr virus.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Digital PCR in Virology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Review
- Associations of cytomegalovirus infection with cancer-related cognitive impairment and peripheral neuropathy in ovarian cancer survivors.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- Present and Future Applications of Digital PCR in Infectious Diseases Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital PCR (dPCR) can quantify cell-free viral DNA (DNAemia), a biomarker of active viral infection. To accelerate epidemiologic investigation into low-level viral reactivation in chronic disease, we have evaluated the performance of dPCR to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia across platforms and blood matrices.
methodsThe droplet-based (BioRad) dPCR platform performance was compared to chip-based (BioMark), and assay validation followed dMIQE guidelines. CMV and EBV DNA reference materials were spiked into known negative plasma and serum samples. In addition, two independent cohorts of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated for viral DNAemia (n = 65 serum and 79 plasma samples).
resultsThe limit of quantification (LOQ) was at or slightly above 100 copies/mL for both instruments: 105-135 copies/mL for droplet-based detection and 100 copies/mL for chip-based detection. DNAemia in serum had a slightly lower LOQ (105-110 copies/mL) compared to plasma (LOQ; 115-135 copies/mL). The variation (CV) coefficients for each assay and machine were less than 5 %. In patient samples, CVs ranged from 4.5 - 7.4 % and were similar for cell-free DNA derived from serum or plasma. There was good correlation between DNAemia measurements in patient samples across dPCR platforms (r > 0.90 for each assay and matrix).
conclusiondPCR can quantify low-level herpes virus DNAemia with CVs below 8 %. Our results indicate that using serum-derived cell-free DNA and droplet-based dPCR is optimal for quantitating low-level viral DNAemia; however, plasma and chip-based approaches are acceptable alternatives and suitable for epidemiologic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.