Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38184072›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2024

Quantification of low-level human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia by digital PCR.

DeVon N Hunter-Schlichting, Rachel I Vogel, Melissa A Geller, Heather H Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

DeVon N Hunter-SchlichtingMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rachel I VogelMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Melissa A GellerMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Heather H NelsonMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address: hhnelson@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Viral priming and targeting NK cells against solid tumor malignanciesR35CA197292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MILLER, JEFFREY S. · 2015 to 2021
$6.2M
Department of Defense OC180211 W81XWH-19-1-0014Department of Defense OC180392 W81XWH-19-1-0013NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital PCR (dPCR) can quantify cell-free viral DNA (DNAemia), a biomarker of active viral infection. To accelerate epidemiologic investigation into low-level viral reactivation in chronic disease, we have evaluated the performance of dPCR to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia across platforms and blood matrices.

methodsThe droplet-based (BioRad) dPCR platform performance was compared to chip-based (BioMark), and assay validation followed dMIQE guidelines. CMV and EBV DNA reference materials were spiked into known negative plasma and serum samples. In addition, two independent cohorts of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated for viral DNAemia (n = 65 serum and 79 plasma samples).

resultsThe limit of quantification (LOQ) was at or slightly above 100 copies/mL for both instruments: 105-135 copies/mL for droplet-based detection and 100 copies/mL for chip-based detection. DNAemia in serum had a slightly lower LOQ (105-110 copies/mL) compared to plasma (LOQ; 115-135 copies/mL). The variation (CV) coefficients for each assay and machine were less than 5 %. In patient samples, CVs ranged from 4.5 - 7.4 % and were similar for cell-free DNA derived from serum or plasma. There was good correlation between DNAemia measurements in patient samples across dPCR platforms (r > 0.90 for each assay and matrix).

conclusiondPCR can quantify low-level herpes virus DNAemia with CVs below 8 %. Our results indicate that using serum-derived cell-free DNA and droplet-based dPCR is optimal for quantitating low-level viral DNAemia; however, plasma and chip-based approaches are acceptable alternatives and suitable for epidemiologic investigation.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsCytomegalovirus InfectionsEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsCytomegalovirusDNA, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionViral LoadCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, ViralCMVDigital PCRDNAemiaEBVEpidemiologic studiesValidationViral load

Identifiers

PMID38184072
PMCPMC11321275
OpenAlexW4390576194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.