Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183979›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2024

A modular and adaptable analysis pipeline to compare slow cerebral rhythms across heterogeneous datasets.

Robin Gutzen, Giulia De Bonis, Chiara De Luca, Elena Pastorelli, Cristiano Capone, Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro, Francesco Resta, Arnau Manasanch, Francesco Saverio Pavone, Maria V Sanchez-Vives and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Robin GutzenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institute Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Theoretical Systems Neurobiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: r.gutzen@fz-juelich.de.
Giulia De BonisIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Chiara De LucaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy; Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zürich and ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Elena PastorelliIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Cristiano CaponeIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Anna Letizia Allegra MascaroEuropean Laboratory for Non-linear Spectroscopy (LENS), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco RestaEuropean Laboratory for Non-linear Spectroscopy (LENS), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Arnau ManasanchInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco Saverio PavoneEuropean Laboratory for Non-linear Spectroscopy (LENS), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; National Institute of Optics, National Research Council, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Maria V Sanchez-VivesInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Maurizio MattiaNational Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy.
Sonja GrünInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institute Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany; Theoretical Systems Neurobiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Pier Stanislao PaolucciIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Michael DenkerInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA-Institute Brain Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience is moving toward a more integrative discipline where understanding brain function requires consolidating the accumulated evidence seen across experiments, species, and measurement techniques. A remaining challenge on that path is integrating such heterogeneous data into analysis workflows such that consistent and comparable conclusions can be distilled as an experimental basis for models and theories. Here, we propose a solution in the context of slow-wave activity (<1 Hz), which occurs during unconscious brain states like sleep and general anesthesia and is observed across diverse experimental approaches. We address the issue of integrating and comparing heterogeneous data by conceptualizing a general pipeline design that is adaptable to a variety of inputs and applications. Furthermore, we present the Collaborative Brain Wave Analysis Pipeline (Cobrawap) as a concrete, reusable software implementation to perform broad, detailed, and rigorous comparisons of slow-wave characteristics across multiple, openly available electrocorticography (ECoG) and calcium imaging datasets.

Indexed as

Brain WavesSoftwareBrainBrain MappingSleepcerebral cortexcortical oscillationsCP: NeuroscienceCP: Systems biologydata analysisECoGreproducibilityslow-wave activitysoftware toolsvalidationwide-field calcium imagingworkflow

Identifiers

PMID38183979
PMCPMC10831958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.