Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183858›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal on drug policy2024

Effect of modified income assistance payment schedules on substance use service access: Evidence from an experimental study.

Kaye Robinson, Allison Laing, JinCheol Choi, Lindsey Richardson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal on drug policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaye RobinsonProvidence Health Care, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC V6Z1Y6, Canada; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Allison LaingBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Sociology, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.
JinCheol ChoiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Lindsey RichardsonBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Sociology, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada. Electronic address: bccsu-lr@bccsu.ubc.ca.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CAProvidence Health Care · CA

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
Impulsivity and Stimulant Drug RewardF32DA033756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2012 to 2014
$130k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA033756NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite being critical to reducing the impacts of poverty internationally, synchronized monthly government income assistance payments are linked to intensified drug use and associated harms, including disrupted access to substance use-related services. This study evaluates whether alternative income assistance distribution schedules improve harm reduction (HR), pharmacotherapy and substance use service utilization.

methodsThis exploratory, parallel group, unblinded, randomized controlled trial analyzed data from adults (n = 192) in Vancouver, Canada receiving income assistance, and reporting active, regular illicit drug use. Participants were randomly assigned on a 1:2:2 basis for six income assistance payment cycles to: (1) existing government schedules (control); (2) a "staggered" single monthly payment; or (3) "split & staggered" twice-monthly payments. Generalized linear mixed models analyzed secondary outcomes of HR, pharmacotherapy and substance use service utilization as well as barriers accessing these services.

resultsForty-five control, 71 staggered, and 76 split & staggered volunteers participated between 2015 and 2019. Multivariable modified per-protocol analyses demonstrate increased access to substance use services (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.02-2.64) for split & staggered arm participants, and, conversely, increased barriers to HR for participants in the staggered (AOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.24-4.41) and split & staggered (AOR 2.16, 95% CI 1.08-4.35) arms. Results also showed decreased barriers to pharmacotherapy around government payments (AOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.90), pharmacotherapy around individual payments (AOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.58), and HR around individual payments (AOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.63) for staggered arm participants.

conclusionModifying payments schedules demonstrate improved access to overall substance use services, and reduced barriers to HR and pharmacotherapy around income assistance payments. However, increased overall barriers to HR access were also shown. These complex, predominantly beneficial findings support the exploration of offering alternative payment schedules to support service access.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAdultCanadaHumansIncomeLinear ModelsPovertyDrug-related harmHarm reduction, substance use servicesIncome assistancePharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38183858
PMCPMC12129125
OpenAlexW4390629374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.