Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183857›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2024

Neurobiological sensitivity to popular peers moderates daily links between social media use and affect.

Maria T Maza, Seh-Joo Kwon, Nathan A Jorgensen, Jimmy Capella, Mitchell J Prinstein, Kristen A Lindquist, Eva H Telzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria T MazaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: maria.maza@unc.edu.
Seh-Joo KwonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nathan A JorgensenDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jimmy CapellaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mitchell J PrinsteinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kristen A LindquistDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media behaviors increase during adolescence, and quantifiable feedback metrics (e.g., likes, followers) may amplify the value of social status for teens. Social media's impact on adolescents' daily affect may be exacerbated given the neurodevelopmental changes that increase youths' sensitivity to socio-emotional information. This study examines whether neurobiological sensitivity to popularity moderates daily links between social media use and affect. Adolescents (N = 91, M

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSocial MediaAdolescentHumansPeer GroupPrefrontal CortexSchoolsSocial BehaviorAdolescenceDaily diariesEmotionsFMRIPopularitySocial media

Identifiers

PMID38183857
PMCPMC10818203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.