Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183711›Full record

ReviewNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2024

Genomic profiling in GIST: Implications in clinical outcome and future challenges.

German Calderillo-Ruíz, Eloy Andrés Pérez-Yepez, María Alejandra García-Gámez, Oliver Millan-Catalan, Consuelo Díaz-Romero, Paul Ugalde-Silva, Rodrigo Salas-Benavides, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia, Berenice Carbajal-López

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Trends and outcomes for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for stage I to III gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Potential biomarkers for the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

German Calderillo-RuízDepartamento de Oncología Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, México.
Eloy Andrés Pérez-YepezLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico.
María Alejandra García-GámezUniversidad Durango Santander, Sonora México.
Oliver Millan-CatalanLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico.
Consuelo Díaz-RomeroDepartamento de Oncología Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, México.
Paul Ugalde-SilvaRhode Island Hospital and Brown University, RI, USA.
Rodrigo Salas-BenavidesFundación GIST México, A.B.P, Nuevo León, México.
Carlos Pérez-PlasenciaLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico; Laboratorio de Genómica Funcional. UBIMED, FES-IZTACALA, UNAM, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.
Berenice Carbajal-LópezDepartamento de Oncología Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, México; Laboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico; Fundación GIST México, A.B.P, Nuevo León, México. Electronic address: bere.carbajal@fundaciongist.org.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXAutonomous University of Tlaxcala · MXBrown University · USUniversidad Autónoma España de Durango · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasia of the digestive tract. Genomic alterations in KIT, PDFGRA, SDH, and BRAF genes are essential in GIST oncogenesis. Therefore, the mutations in these genes have demonstrated clinical implications. Tumors with deletions in KIT-exon 11 or duplications in exon 9 are associated with a worse prognosis. In contrast, KIT-exon 11 substitutions and duplications are associated with a better clinical outcome. Moreover, mutations in Kit exon 9 and 11 are actionable, due to their response to imatinib, while mutations in PDGFRA respond to sunitinib and/or avapritinib. Although, molecular testing on tissue samples is effective; it is invasive, requires adequate amounts of tissue, and a long experimental process is needed for results. In contrast, liquid biopsy has been proposed as a simple and non-invasive method to test biomarkers in cancer. The most common molecule analyzed by liquid biopsy is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). GISTs ctDNA testing has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying known and novel KIT mutations that were not detected using traditional tissue DNA testing and have been useful in determining progression risk and response to TKI therapy. This allows the clinician to have an accurate picture of the genetic changes of the tumor over time. In this work, we aimed to discuss the implications of mutational testing in clinical outcomes, the methods to test ctDNA and the future challenges in the establishment of alternatives of personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaSunitinibImatinib MesylateProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaSunitinibGenomic profilingGISTKITMutationsPDGFRATreatment

Identifiers

PMID38183711
PMCPMC10808967
OpenAlexW4390629281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.