Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183612›Full record

ReviewDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2024

A Systematic Literature Review of Psychological Interventions for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Onyinye Diribe, Karen Palmer, Adee Kennedy, Marissa Betts, Katarzyna Borkowska, Cecile Dessapt-Baradez, Mike Baxter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Onyinye DiribeSanofi UK, 410 Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading, RG6 1PT, UK. onyi.diribe@sanofi.com.
Karen PalmerSanofi UK, 410 Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading, RG6 1PT, UK.
Adee KennedySanofi US, 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA.
Marissa BettsEvidera, Inc., 5th Floor, 500 Totten Pond Road, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Katarzyna BorkowskaEvidera, Inc., Domaniewska 49, 02-672, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1221-0681
Cecile Dessapt-BaradezSanofi UK, 410 Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading, RG6 1PT, UK.
Mike BaxterDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Sanofi (United Kingdom) · GBBG Group (United Kingdom) · GBIthaka Harbors · USSanofi (United States) · USSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe psychological burden of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is considerable. The condition affects the daily lives of adults living with T1DM (ALWT1DM) in many ways. International guidelines highlight the importance of providing psychological support to ALWT1DM to improve health outcomes and well-being.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the evidence on the impact of psychological interventions on glycaemic control and psychological outcomes in ALWT1DM. Literature searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and the grey literature were performed to identify relevant RCTs, published in English, from 2001 onward. Fourteen RCTs of ten psychological interventions in ALWT1DM were eligible and included in the qualitative synthesis. The studies varied considerably in terms of duration, target population, endpoints, and efficacy.

resultsOverall, psychological interventions did not perform significantly better than control treatments in improving glycaemic control, although selected patient groups did report benefits from some psychological intervention types, such as cognitive behavioural therapy. Although most of the psychological interventions produced small, nonsignificant improvements in self-reported patient functioning, some treatments were effective in reducing diabetes distress and improving mental health, even if no impact on glycaemic control was observed. DISCUSSION: Current guidelines for the treatment of T1DM recommend access to psychological services; however, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence from clinical trials on the effectiveness or preferred structure of psychological support. There is a clear need for more rigorous, large-scale, international research to address the efficacy of psychological interventions in ALWT1DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes type 1Psychological interventionRandomised controlled trialSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38183612
PMCPMC10838890
OpenAlexW4390638226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.