Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183463›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2024

Soil microbial community response to ectomycorrhizal dominance in diverse neotropical montane forests.

Joseph D Edwards, Alexander H Krichels, Georgia S Seyfried, James Dalling, Angela D Kent, Wendy H Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph D EdwardsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. jedwar98@utk.edu.
Alexander H KrichelsUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Albuquerque, NM, 87102, USA.
Georgia S SeyfriedDepartment of Forest Ecology and Resource Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
James DallingDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Angela D KentDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Wendy H YangDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology 2305863National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program 1069157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectomycorrhizal (EM) associations can promote the dominance of tree species in otherwise diverse tropical forests. These EM associations between trees and their fungal mutualists have important consequences for soil organic matter cycling, yet the influence of these EM-associated effects on surrounding microbial communities is not well known, particularly in neotropical forests. We examined fungal and prokaryotic community composition in surface soil samples from mixed arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) stands as well as stands dominated by EM-associated Oreomunnea mexicana (Juglandaceae) in four watersheds differing in soil fertility in the Fortuna Forest Reserve, Panama. We hypothesized that EM-dominated stands would support distinct microbial community assemblages relative to the mixed AM-EM stands due to differences in carbon and nitrogen cycling associated with the dominance of EM trees. We expected that this microbiome selection in EM-dominated stands would lead to lower overall microbial community diversity and turnover, with tighter correspondence between general fungal and prokaryotic communities. We measured fungal and prokaryotic community composition via high-throughput Illumina sequencing of the ITS2 (fungi) and 16S rRNA (prokaryotic) gene regions. We analyzed differences in alpha and beta diversity between forest stands associated with different mycorrhizal types, as well as the relative abundance of fungal functional groups and various microbial taxa. We found that fungal and prokaryotic community composition differed based on stand mycorrhizal type. There was lower prokaryotic diversity and lower relative abundance of fungal saprotrophs and pathogens in EM-dominated than AM-EM mixed stands. However, contrary to our prediction, there was lower homogeneity for fungal communities in EM-dominated stands compared to mixed AM-EM stands. Overall, we demonstrate that EM-dominated tropical forest stands have distinct soil microbiomes relative to surrounding diverse forests, suggesting that EM fungi may filter microbial functional groups in ways that could potentially influence plant performance or ecosystem function.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycorrhizaeForestsFungiRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyTreesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilFungal pathogensMicrobial communityMycorrhizal associationsMycorrhizal-bacterial interactionsTropical forest

Identifiers

PMID38183463
PMCPMC10998807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.