Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183453›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Predictors in the treatment of malignant central airway obstruction with silicone stents.

Mads Bøgh, Søren Gade, Dalia Gustaityté Larsen, Sten Schytte, Ulrik Pedersen, Thomas Kjærgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mads BøghOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren GadeOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dalia Gustaityté LarsenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sten SchytteOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ulrik PedersenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas KjærgaardOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. thokjaer@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-4812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the role of the silicone stent in palliation of malignant central airway obstruction and identify potential preprocedural predictors for postprocedural outcome.

methodsPatients treated with endoscopic insertion of tracheobronchial silicone stents for malignant central airway obstruction at Aarhus University Hospital from 2012 to 2022 were identified from electronic medical records. Statistical analyses were carried out to identify factors affecting Days Alive and Out of Hospital, complications and overall survival.

results81 patients underwent a total of 90 tracheobronchial stent insertions. Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) for the first 30 days were affected negatively by urgent intervention, p < 0.001, preprocedural non-invasive respiratory support, p < 0.001, and preprocedural intubation, p = 0.02. Post-procedural oncological treatment was associated with a significant improved DAOH, p = 0.04. Symptomatology and lesion characteristics were not significantly associated with any impact on DAOH. Overall survival was poor (mean survival was 158 days), and only significantly affected by severe degree of dyspnea, p = 0.02, and postprocedural oncological treatment, p < 0.001. Complication where registered in 25.6% of cases within the first 30 days was observed. Procedure-related mortality was 3.7%. Based on chart annotations by an ENT-surgeon, 95% of the patients experienced relief of symptoms following stent insertion.

conclusionsPalliative tracheobronchial airway stenting with silicone stents is found to have a beneficial impact, more research is required for identification of predictors for postprocedural outcome based on preprocedural classifications.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionSiliconesBronchoscopyHumansPalliative CareStentsTreatment OutcomeSiliconesCentral airway obstructionEndoscopic treatmentMalignancyStent

Identifiers

PMID38183453
PMCPMC10858089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.