Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183430›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2024

Improved prognostic stratification of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma.

Michael Weller, Jörg Felsberg, Bettina Hentschel, Dorothee Gramatzki, Nadezhda Kubon, Marietta Wolter, Matthias Reusche, Patrick Roth, Dietmar Krex, Ulrich Herrlinger and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. michael.weller@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-174X
Jörg FelsbergInstitute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bettina HentschelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Dorothee GramatzkiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nadezhda KubonInstitute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marietta WolterInstitute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Matthias ReuscheInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Patrick RothDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dietmar KrexFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDepartment of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Manfred WestphalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Joerg C TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claude-Alain MaurageDepartment of Pathology, Centre Biologie Pathologie, Lille University Hospital, Hopital Nord, Lille, France.
Andreas von DeimlingDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Torsten PietschDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Bonn Medical Center, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, Bonn, Germany.
Emilie Le RhunDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Guido ReifenbergerInstitute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic factors and standards of care for astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4, remain poorly defined. Here we sought to explore disease characteristics, prognostic markers, and outcome in patients with this newly defined tumor type. We determined molecular biomarkers and assembled clinical and outcome data in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas confirmed by central pathology review. Patients were identified in the German Glioma Network cohort study; additional cohorts of patients with CNS WHO grade 4 tumors were identified retrospectively at two sites. In total, 258 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas (114 CNS WHO grade 2, 73 CNS WHO grade 3, 71 CNS WHO grade 4) were studied. The median age at diagnosis was similar for all grades. Karnofsky performance status at diagnosis inversely correlated with CNS WHO grade (p < 0.001). Despite more intensive treatment upfront with higher grade, CNS WHO grade was strongly prognostic: median overall survival was not reached for grade 2 (median follow-up 10.4 years), 8.1 years (95% CI 5.4-10.8) for grade 3, and 4.7 years (95% CI 3.4-6.0) for grade 4. Among patients with CNS WHO grade 4 astrocytoma, median overall survival was 5.5 years (95% CI 4.3-6.7) without (n = 58) versus 1.8 years (95% CI 0-4.1) with (n = 12) homozygous CDKN2A deletion. Lower levels of global DNA methylation as detected by LINE-1 methylation analysis were strongly associated with CNS WHO grade 4 (p < 0.001) and poor outcome. MGMT promoter methylation status was not prognostic for overall survival. Histomolecular stratification based on CNS WHO grade, LINE-1 methylation level, and CDKN2A status revealed four subgroups of patients with significantly different outcomes. In conclusion, CNS WHO grade, global DNA methylation status, and CDKN2A homozygous deletion are prognostic in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Combination of these parameters allows for improved prediction of outcome. These data aid in designing upcoming trials using IDH inhibitors.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseCohort StudiesHomozygoteHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSequence DeletionIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseBrainCDKN2ACNS WHO gradeIDHLINE-1Molecular

Identifiers

PMID38183430
PMCPMC10771615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.