Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183308›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Birth asphyxia and its association with grand multiparity and referral among hospital births: A prospective cross-sectional study in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.

Greta Handing, Manuela Straneo, Christian Agossou, Phillip Wanduru, Bianca Kandeya, Muzdalifat S Abeid, Kristi S Annerstedt, Claudia Hanson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Greta HandingDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0528-9838
Manuela StraneoDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian AgossouDepartment of Statistics, Center for Research in Human Reproduction and Demography, Cotonou, Benin.
Phillip WanduruSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Mulago Kampala, Uganda.
Bianca KandeyaCenter for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Chichiri, Malawi.
Muzdalifat S AbeidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kristi S AnnerstedtDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEAga Khan Hospital Dar es Salaam · TZCenter for Human Reproduction · USMakerere University · UGUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

European Commission Horizon 2020 (No 847824)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBirth asphyxia is a leading cause of neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. The relationship to grand multiparity (GM), a controversial pregnancy risk factor, remains largely unexplored, especially in the context of large multinational studies. We investigated birth asphyxia and its association with GM and referral in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a prospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected using a perinatal e-Registry in 16 hospitals (four per country). The study population consisted of 80 663 babies (>1000 g, >28 weeks' gestational age) delivered between July 2021 and December 2022. The primary outcome was birth asphyxia, defined by 5-minute appearance, pulse, grimace, activity and respiration score <7. A multilevel and stratified multivariate logistic regression was performed with GM (parity ≥5) as exposure, and birth asphyxia as outcome. An interaction between referral (none, prepartum, intrapartum) and GM was also evaluated as a secondary outcome. All models were adjusted for confounders. CLINICAL TRIAL: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202006793783148.

resultsBirth asphyxia was present in 7.0% (n = 5612) of babies. More babies with birth asphyxia were born to grand multiparous women (11.9%) than to other parity groups (≤7.6%). Among the 76 850 cases included in the analysis, grand multiparous women had a 1.34 times higher odds of birth asphyxia (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.54) vs para one to two. Grand multiparous women referred intrapartum had the highest probability of asphyxiation (13.02%, 95% CI 9.34-16.69). GM increased odds of birth asphyxia in Benin (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.68) and Uganda (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.64), but was non-significant in Tanzania (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.81-2.56) and Malawi (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.67-1.44).

conclusionsThere is some evidence of an increased risk of birth asphyxia for grand multiparous women having babies at hospitals, especially following intrapartum referral. Antenatal counseling should recognize grand multiparity as higher risk and advise appropriate childbirth facilities. Findings in Malawi suggest an advantage of health systems configuration requiring further exploration.

Indexed as

AsphyxiaAsphyxia NeonatorumBeninCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornMalawiParityPregnancyProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationTanzaniaUgandahigh-risklow-income countryobstetricspregnancypregnancy birth

Identifiers

PMID38183308
PMCPMC10867390
OpenAlexW4390637344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.