Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183145›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

Development and evaluation of a patient-reported outcome measure specific for Gaucher disease with or without neurological symptoms in Japan.

Aya Narita, Yuta Koto, Shinichi Noto, Masafumi Okada, Midori Ono, Terumi Baba, Rieko Sagara, Norio Sakai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aya NaritaDivision of Child Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Neurological Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Yuta KotoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Osaka Aoyama University, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichi NotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Masafumi OkadaReal-World Evidence Solutions & HEOR, IQVIA Solutions Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Midori OnoJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Terumi BabaJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Rieko SagaraJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio SakaiChild Healthcare and Genetic Science Laboratory, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1‑7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565‑0871, Japan. norio@sahs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-3374-6709
Takeda (Japan) · JPNiigata University of Health and Welfare · JPOsaka Aoyama University · JPOsaka Health Science University · JPTottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with Gaucher disease (GD), a rare lysosomal storage disorder, have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for HRQOL developed for type 1 GD (GD1) is not appropriate for patients with neuronopathic GD (nGD) types 2 (GD2) and 3 (GD3). In this study, we developed a new PROM for use in all GD types. We previously reported the qualitative analysis of interviews with Japanese patients with nGD, which was used to create nGD-specific PROM items. Here we evaluated the full PROM combining the type 1 questionnaire with the new nGD-specific items.

methodsPatients with confirmed GD were recruited (Association of Gaucher Disease Patients in Japan or leading doctors) for pre-testing (May 2021) or the main survey (October-December 2021). The PROM had three parts: Parts 1 and 2 were translated into Japanese from the pre-existing GD1 PROM, whereas Part 3 was newly developed. Patients (or their caregivers, where necessary) completed the PROM questionnaire on paper and returned it by mail. Mean scores were determined overall and by GD type. Inter-item correlations, content consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and test-retest reliability (Cohen's kappa; main survey only, taken 2 weeks apart) were calculated.

resultsSixteen patients (three with GD1; six with GD2; seven with GD3) and 33 patients (nine with GD1; 13 with GD2; 11 with GD3) participated in the pre-test and main survey, respectively. All GD2 patients and one-third (6/18) of GD3 patients required caregivers to complete the questionnaire. Mean scores indicated that the burden was highest in GD2 and lowest in GD1. In the main survey, internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.898 overall, 0.916 for Part 3), and test-retest reliability was high for Part 3 (kappa > 0.60 for 13/16 items) but low for Part 1 (kappa < 0.60 for 12/15 items).

conclusionsWe have developed a flexible and reliable PROM that can be tailored for use in all types of GD and propose using Parts 1 and 2 for GD1, Parts 2 and 3 for GD2, and Parts 1, 2, and 3 for GD3.

Indexed as

Gaucher DiseaseHumansJapanPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsBurden of diseaseGaucher diseaseJapanNeuronopathic Gaucher diseasePatient reported outcome measuresQuality of lifeReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID38183145
PMCPMC10770997
OpenAlexW4390617426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.