Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183134›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Treatment in certified cancer centers is related to better survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer: evidence from a large German cohort study.

Veronika Bierbaum, Christoph Bobeth, Martin Roessler, Michael Gerken, Kees Kleihues-van Tol, Christoph Reissfelder, Alois Fürst, Christian Günster, Patrik Dröge, Thomas Ruhnke and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical practice guidelines and associated survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika BierbaumZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. veronika.bierbaum@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Christoph BobethZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin RoesslerZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael GerkenArbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Kees Kleihues-van TolTumorzentrum Regensburg, Zentrum für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung an der Fakultät für Medizin der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christoph ReissfelderChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alois FürstKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thoraxchirurgie, Adipositasmedizin, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian GünsterAOK Research Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Patrik DrögeAOK Research Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas RuhnkeAOK Research Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Monika Klinkhammer-SchalkeArbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Jochen SchmittZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Olaf SchofferZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DEWissenschaftliches Institut der AOK · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DECaritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01VSF17020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertified cancer centers aim to ensure high-quality care by establishing structural and procedural standards according to evidence-based guidelines. Despite the high clinical and health policy relevance, evidence from a nation-wide study for the effectiveness of care for colorectal cancer in certified centers vs. other hospitals in Germany is still missing.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study covering the years 2009-2017, we analyzed patient data using demographic information, diagnoses, and treatments from a nationwide statutory health insurance enriched with information on certification. We investigated whether patients with incident colon or rectal cancer did benefit from primary therapy in a certified cancer center. We used relative survival analysis taking into account mortality data of the German population and adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics via Cox regression with shared frailty for patients in hospitals with and without certification.

resultsThe cohorts for colon and rectal cancer consisted of 109,518 and 51,417 patients, respectively, treated in a total of 1052 hospitals. 37.2% of patients with colon and 42.9% of patients with rectal cancer were treated in a certified center. Patient age, sex, comorbidities, secondary malignoma, and distant metastases were similar across groups (certified/non-certified) for both colon and rectal cancer. Relative survival analysis showed significantly better survival of patients treated in a certified center, with 68.3% (non-certified hospitals 65.8%) 5-year survival for treatment of colon cancer in certified (p < 0.001) and 65.0% (58.8%) 5-year survival in case of rectal cancer (p < 0.001), respectively. Cox regression with adjustment for relevant covariates yielded a lower hazard of death for patients treated in certified centers for both colon (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95) and rectal cancer (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.95). The results remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsThis large cohort study yields new important evidence that patients with colorectal cancer have a better chance of survival if treated in a certified cancer center. Certification thus provides one powerful means to improve the quality of care for colorectal cancer. To decrease the burden of disease, more patients should thus receive cancer care in a certified center.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsCertificationCohort StudiesColonHumansRetrospective StudiesCertified cancer centerCohort studyColon cancerCox regressionQuality of cancer careRectal cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID38183134
PMCPMC10770882
OpenAlexW4390630533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.