Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183129›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Improving the quality of antenatal screening and early intervention for alcohol and other drug use: protocol for a multi-stage approach to systems reform.

Matthew W R Stevens, Megan Cooper, Lynette Cusack, Robert L Ali, Annette L Briley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew W R StevensSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. matthew.stevens@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8797-9244
Megan CooperCaring Futures Institute Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Lynette CusackAdelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Robert L AliSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Annette L BrileyCaring Futures Institute Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government 4-HPM6GG7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use during pregnancy can cause significant harm to women and their developing fetuses. Despite recommendations for abstinence during pregnancy, some women continue to use, making screening for substance use during antenatal clinic attendances an important strategy for reducing risk. This study aims to improve the rates of screening and intervention for substance use among pregnant women, including appropriate referral for those who may be substance-dependent. The protocol outlined here focuses on a multi-stage implementation study.

methodsThis study will occur in four phases. Phase 1 will identify a baseline rate of screening and subsequent care at the antenatal clinics of two, South Australian hospital-based maternity services, through a retrospective case note audit. Rates of self-reported substance use identified in the case notes will also be compared against representative data from Adelaide Primary Health Network to establish rates of over or underreporting. Phase 2 will involve an online Training Needs Analysis of midwifery staff working at those services, to assess their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and commitment to the care of women who use substances during pregnancy. Phase 3 will involve a training package for all midwifery staff at those services, focused on routine screening for substance use, and how to provide appropriate care. Outcome measures from phase 2 will be reassessed during phase 3 and any changes since training will be evaluated. Phase 4 will then repeat phase 1 to compare the changes in rates of both screening and any associated intervention before and after training. DISCUSSION: From a public health perspective, this project has the potential to make a significant impact on reducing risk of harm from substance use disorders among pregnant women, and contribute to better health outcomes for their children.

trial registrationThis trial has been pre-registered under the Open Science Framework. REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/73FDZ .

Indexed as

EthanolSubstance-Related DisordersAustraliaChildFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesEthanol

Identifiers

PMID38183129
PMCPMC10768159
OpenAlexW4390608674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.