Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182989›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Comparative chloroplast genomics of 24 species shed light on the genome evolution and phylogeny of subtribe Coelogyninae (Orchidaceae).

Lin Li, Qiuping Wu, Junwen Zhai, Kunlin Wu, Lin Fang, Mingzhi Li, Songjun Zeng, Shijin Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative organellar genomics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plastome Evolution, Phylogenomics, and DNA Barcoding Investigation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lin Li *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Qiuping Wu *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Junwen ZhaiKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization at College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Kunlin WuKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Lin FangKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Mingzhi LiGuangzhou Bio & Data Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, 510555, China.
Songjun ZengKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China. zengsongjun@scib.ac.cn.
Shijin LiUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. lisj@scib.ac.cn.
South China Botanical Garden · CNBeijing Botanical Garden · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31770215National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe orchids of the subtribe Coelogyninae are among the most morphologically diverse and economically important groups within the subfamily Epidendroideae. Previous molecular studies have revealed that Coelogyninae is an unambiguously monophyletic group. However, intergeneric and infrageneric relationships within Coelogyninae are largely unresolved. There has been long controversy over the classification among the genera within the subtribe.

resultsThe complete chloroplast (cp.) genomes of 15 species in the subtribe Coelogyninae were newly sequenced and assembled. Together with nine available cp. genomes in GenBank from representative clades of the subtribe, we compared and elucidated the characteristics of 24 Coelogyninae cp. genomes. The results showed that all cp. genomes shared highly conserved structure and contained 135 genes arranged in the same order, including 89 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNAs, and eight rRNAs. Nevertheless, structural variations in relation to particular genes at the IR/SC boundary regions were identified. The diversification pattern of the cp. genomes showed high consistency with the phylogenetic placement of Coelogyninae. The number of different types of SSRs and long repeats exhibited significant differences in the 24 Coelogyninae cp. genomes, wherein mononucleotide repeats (A/T), and palindromic repeats were the most abundant. Four mutation hotspot regions (ycf1a, ndhF-rp132, psaC-ndhE, and rp132-trnL) were determined, which could serve as effective molecular markers. Selection pressure analysis revealed that three genes (ycf1a, rpoC2 and ycf2 genes) might have experienced apparent positive selection during the evolution. Using the alignments of whole cp. genomes and protein-coding sequences, this study presents a well-resolved phylogenetic framework of Coelogyninae.

conclusionThe inclusion of 55 plastid genome data from a nearly complete generic-level sampling provide a comprehensive view of the phylogenetic relationships among genera and species in subtribe Coelogyninae and illustrate the diverse genetic variation patterns of plastid genomes in this species-rich plant group. The inferred relationships and informally recognized major clades within the subtribe are presented. The genetic markers identified here will facilitate future studies on the genetics and phylogeny of subtribe Coelogyninae.

Indexed as

OrchidaceaeChloroplastsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsPhylogenyChloroplast genomeCoelogyninaeComparative analysisPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38182989
PMCPMC10768429
OpenAlexW4390612839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.