ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Assessing the effect of scanning parameter on the size and density of pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Identification of histological carotid plaque vulnerability by CT angiography using perivascular adipose tissue radiomics signature.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Insights into geometric deviations of medical 3d-printing: a phantom study utilizing error propagation analysis.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains a leading cause of death among cancer patients. Computed tomography (CT) plays a key role in lung cancer screening. Previous studies have not adequately quantified the effect of scanning protocols on the detected tumor size. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of various CT scanning parameters on tumor size and densitometry based on a phantom study and to investigate the optimal energy and mA image quality for screening assessment.
methodsWe proposed a new model using the LUNGMAN N1 phantom multipurpose anthropomorphic chest phantom (diameters: 8, 10, and 12 mm; CT values: - 100, - 630, and - 800 HU) to evaluate the influence of changes in tube voltage and tube current on the size and density of pulmonary nodules. In the LUNGMAN N1 model, three types of simulated lung nodules representing solid tumors of different sizes were used. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to evaluate the image quality of each scanning combination. The consistency between the calculated results based on segmentation from two physicists was evaluated using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsIn terms of nodule size, the longest diameters of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) were closest to the ground truth on the images measured at 100 kVp tube voltage, and the longest diameters of solid nodules were closest to the ground truth on the images measured at 80 kVp tube voltage. In respect to density, the CT values of GGNs and solid nodules were closest to the ground truth when measured at 80 kVp and 100 kVp tube voltage, respectively. The overall agreement demonstrates that the measurements were consistent between the two physicists.
conclusionsOur proposed model demonstrated that a combination of 80 kVp and 140 mA scans was preferred for measuring the size of the solid nodules, and a combination of 100 kVp and 100 mA scans was preferred for measuring the size of the GGNs when performing lung cancer screening. The CT values at 80 kVp and 100 kVp were preferred for the measurement of GGNs and solid nodules, respectively, which were closest to the true CT values of the nodules. Therefore, the combination of scanning parameters should be selected for different types of nodules to obtain more accurate nodal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.