Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182910›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2024

Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 695,912 deliveries in France in 2018.

Nolwenn Regnault, Elodie Lebreton, Luveon Tang, Sandrine Fosse-Edorh, Yaya Barry, Valérie Olié, Cécile Billionnet, Alain Weill, Anne Vambergue, Emmanuel Cosson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nolwenn RegnaultSanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0781-1450
Elodie LebretonSanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2281-2942
Luveon TangSanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5138-5332
Sandrine Fosse-EdorhSanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0105-5551
Yaya BarrySanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-2618
Valérie OliéSanté Publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4837-1930
Cécile BillionnetFrench National Health Insurance (CNAM), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-3183
Alain WeillEPI-PHARE Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), Saint-Denis, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8687-9092
Anne VambergueEndocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolism and Nutrition Department, Lille University Hospital, European Genomics Institute for Diabetes, University of Lille, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4307-8695
Emmanuel CossonDepartment of Diabetology-Endocrinology-Nutrition, CRNH-IdF, CINFO, Paris 13 University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France. emmanuel.cosson@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8785-3385
Santé Publique France · FRConservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe aimed to assess maternal-fetal outcomes according to various subtypes of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

methodsWe used data from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé), which links individual data from the hospital discharge database and the French National Health Insurance information system. We included all deliveries after 22 gestational weeks (GW) in women without pre-existing diabetes recorded in 2018. Women with hyperglycaemia were classified as having overt diabetes in pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), then categorised into three subgroups according to their gestational age at the time of GDM diagnosis: before 22 GW (GDM

resultsThe study population of 695,912 women who gave birth in 2018 included 84,705 women (12.2%) with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: overt diabetes in pregnancy, 0.4%; GDM CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationCompared with GDM

Indexed as

Brachial Plexus NeuropathiesDiabetes, GestationalHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaPremature BirthBirth WeightCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeCaesarean sectionDiabetesGestational diabetes mellitusMacrosomiaOvert diabetes in pregnancyPerinatal deathPreeclampsiaPregnancyPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID38182910
PMCPMC10844424
OpenAlexW4390603278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.