Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182885›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Multi-kingdom microbial signatures in excess body weight colorectal cancer based on global metagenomic analysis.

Xinyue Zhu, Pingping Xu, Ruixin Zhu, Wenxing Gao, Wenjing Yin, Ping Lan, Lixin Zhu, Na Jiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deciphering microbiome and fungi-bacteria interactions in chronic wound infections using metagenomic sequencing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xinyue Zhu *Putuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4168-6196
Pingping Xu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Ruixin ZhuPutuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China. rxzhu@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-6453
Wenxing GaoPutuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-8227
Wenjing YinPutuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
Ping LanGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases; Biomedical Innovation Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-8498
Lixin ZhuGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases; Biomedical Innovation Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. zhulx6@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-1769
Na JiaoNational Clinical Research Center for Child Health, the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China. jiaona@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3976-6313
Tongji University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82000536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excess body weight (EBW) increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is linked to lower colonoscopy compliance. Here, we extensively analyzed 981 metagenome samples from multiple cohorts to pinpoint the specific microbial signatures and their potential capability distinguishing EBW patients with CRC. The gut microbiome displayed considerable variations between EBW and lean CRC. We identify 44 and 37 distinct multi-kingdom microbial species differentiating CRC and controls in EBW and lean populations, respectively. Unique bacterial-fungal associations are also observed between EBW-CRC and lean-CRC. Our analysis revealed specific microbial functions in EBW-CRC, including D-Arginine and D-ornithine metabolism, and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. The best-performing classifier for EBW-CRC, comprising 12 bacterial and three fungal species, achieved an AUROC of 0.90, which was robustly validated across three independent cohorts (AUROC = 0.96, 0.94, and 0.80). Pathogenic microbial species, Anaerobutyricum hallii, Clostridioides difficile and Fusobacterium nucleatum, are EBW-CRC specific signatures. This work unearths the specific multi-kingdom microbial signatures for EBW-CRC and lean CRC, which may contribute to precision diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeArginineHumansMetagenomeWeight GainArginine

Identifiers

PMID38182885
PMCPMC10770074
OpenAlexW4390616647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.