Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182853›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

The effect of visual feedback-based clinical monitoring application in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Fatih Özden, Bekir Güçlü, İsmet Tümtürk, Özgür Nadiye Doğrukök, Ahmet İmerci, Baki Umut Tuğay

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fatih ÖzdenDepartment of Health Care Services, Köyceğiz Vocational School of Health Services, Muğla Sitki Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey. fatihozden@mu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-3758
Bekir GüçlüDepartment of Physiotherapy, Vocational School of Health Services, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey.
İsmet TümtürkDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Özgür Nadiye DoğrukökMuğla Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey.
Ahmet İmerciDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Baki Umut TuğayDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muğla Sitki Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Muğla University · TRSüleyman Demirel University · TRÜsküdar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo study has addressed the effect of patient-reported outcomes as a visual feedback tool during telerehabilitation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a visual feedback-based monitoring application PhysioAnalyst on pain, pain catastrophizing, physical functions, quality of life, usability, satisfaction, and exercise adherence in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

methodsA single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 44 CLBP patients. Participants were randomized into two groups: the tele-assessment feedback group (TAFG) (n = 22) and the control group (CG) (n = 22). Participants were assessed before the intervention, at the 4th week and after the intervention. Individuals were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ), and Exercise Adaptation Rating Scale (EARS) via PhysioAnalyst. Individuals in the TAFG group received graph-based visual feedback on assessment data in week 4.

resultsThe improvement in VAS, NHP, ODI, TUQ, TSQ, and EARS of individuals in TAFG was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Only ODI and PCS scores in CG showed significant improvement (p < 0.05). After the graphics-based visual feedback presented to the TAFG, the VAS, NHP-Emotional, NHP-Sleep, NHP-Total, PCS, TUQ, TSQ, ODI, and EARS scores gained more than CG (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe results confirmed the additional contribution of telerehabilitation's graphics-based visual feedback in pain, pain catastrophizing, disability, quality of life, and exercise participation. Since the importance of continuity in long-term rehabilitation in patients with CLBP is comprehended, feedback to increase patient motivation can be added to telerehabilitation applications.

Indexed as

Low Back PainTelemedicineFeedback, SensoryHumansQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodLow back painRehabilitationTelerehabilitationVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID38182853
OpenAlexW4390638900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.