Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182834›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2024

Women's neuroplasticity during gestation, childbirth and postpartum.

María Paternina-Die, Magdalena Martínez-García, Daniel Martín de Blas, Inés Noguero, Camila Servin-Barthet, Clara Pretus, Anna Soler, Gonzalo López-Montoya, Manuel Desco, Susana Carmona

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
39.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Single-cell map of the female brain across reproductive transitions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

María Paternina-Die *Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-4955
Magdalena Martínez-García *Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-9427
Daniel Martín de BlasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-9460
Inés NogueroInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Camila Servin-BarthetUnitat de Recerca en Neurociéncia Cognitiva, Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara PretusFundació IMIM, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna SolerUnitat de Recerca en Neurociéncia Cognitiva, Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gonzalo López-MontoyaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel DescoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Susana CarmonaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. scarmona@hggm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-6527
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESMunicipal Institute for Medical Research · ES

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 883069"la Caixa" Foundation (Caixa Foundation) LCF/PR/HR19/52160001Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Institute of Health Carlos III) FI18/00255Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Institute of Health Carlos III) PI22/01365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy is a unique neuroplastic period in adult life. This longitudinal study tracked brain cortical changes during the peripartum period and explored how the type of childbirth affects these changes. We collected neuroanatomic, obstetric and neuropsychological data from 110 first-time mothers during late pregnancy and early postpartum, as well as from 34 nulliparous women evaluated at similar time points. During late pregnancy, mothers showed lower cortical volume than controls across all functional networks. These cortical differences attenuated in the early postpartum session. Default mode and frontoparietal networks showed below-expected volume increases during peripartum, suggesting that their reductions may persist longer. Results also pointed to different cortical trajectories in mothers who delivered by scheduled C-section. The main findings were replicated in an independent sample of 29 mothers and 24 nulliparous women. These data suggest a dynamic trajectory of cortical decreases during pregnancy that attenuates in the postpartum period, at a different rate depending on the brain network and childbirth type.

Indexed as

MothersPostpartum PeriodAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38182834
PMCPMC10849958
OpenAlexW4390616023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.