Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182824›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Fluorescence imaging for real-time detection of breast cancer tumors using IV injection of indocyanine green with non-conventional imaging: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies of perioperative imaging technologies.

C Florin Pop, Isabelle Veys, Anne Bormans, Denis Larsimont, Gabriel Liberale

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Reply to Bourgeois P.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Florin PopDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. catalin.florin.pop@hubruxelles.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-4241
Isabelle VeysDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne BormansInstitutional Library, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Denis LarsimontDepartment of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Gabriel LiberaleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review summarizes the available data on the effectiveness of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) for real-time detection of breast cancer (BC) tumors with perioperative imaging technologies.

methodsPubMed and Scopus databases were exhaustively searched for publications on the use of the real-time ICG-FI evaluation of BC tumors with non-conventional breast imaging technologies.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included in this review. ICG-FI has been used for BC tumor identification in 12 orthotopic animal tumor experiences, 4 studies on animal assessment, and for 7 human clinical applications. The BC tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was 1.1-8.5 in orthotopic tumor models and 1.4-3.9 in animal experiences. The detection of primary human BC tumors varied from 40% to 100%. The mean TBR reported for human BC varied from 2.1 to 3.7. In two studies evaluating BC surgical margins, good sensitivity (93.3% and 100%) and specificity (60% and 96%) have been reported, with a negative predictive value of ICG-FI to predict margin involvement intraoperatively of 100% in one study.

conclusionsThe use of ICG-FI as a guiding tool for the real-time identification of BC tumors and for the assessment of tumor boundaries is promising. There is great variability between the studies with regard to timing and dose. Further evidence is needed to assess whether ICG-guided BC surgery may be implemented as a standard of care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsIndocyanine GreenOptical ImagingAnimalsFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousIndocyanine GreenBreast surgeryBreast surgical marginsFluorescence imagingICGICG-FIIndocyanine green

Identifiers

PMID38182824
PMCPMC10959791
OpenAlexW4390629665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.