Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182705›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Genomic epidemiology and evolutionary analysis during XBB.1.16-predominant periods of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in Bangkok, Thailand: December 2022-August 2023.

Jiratchaya Puenpa, Jira Chansaenroj, Kamol Suwannakarn, Yong Poovorawan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gamma SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern infection repercussions on pregnancy outcomes: A translational cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiratchaya PuenpaCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jira ChansaenrojCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kamol SuwannakarnDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Yong.P@chula.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing occurrence of novel recombinants, such as XBB.1.16, has emerged and become predominant, raising concerns about the impact of genomic recombination on the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study investigated the molecular epidemiological trends and evolution of the Omicron XBB.1.16 epidemic in Bangkok between December 2022 and August 2023. Partial spike and complete genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 samples collected from collaborating hospitals were performed. The analysis of 491 partial spike sequences identified 15 distinct lineages, with XBB.1.16 dominating the lineages beginning in March 2023. Phylogenetic analysis revealed at least four distinct XBB.1.16 lineages, suggesting multiple independent introductions into Bangkok. The estimated emergence of XBB.1.16 occurred approximately in January 2022, with an evolutionary rate of 0.79 × 10

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesGenomicsHumansPhylogenySARS-CoV-2ThailandVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38182705
PMCPMC10770311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.