ArticleScientific reports2024
A comparative study of fracture conductivity prediction using ensemble methods in the acid fracturing treatment in oil wells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application and Improvement of Ultradeep Fractured Reservoir Effective Stimulation Reservoir Volume Technology.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Production-Increase Potential Evaluations after Refracturing Low-Shale-Oil-Producing Wells via Machine-Learning-Driven Multisource Data Mining.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Evaluation of hydraulic fracturing using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A rigorous workflow and comparative analysis for accurate determination of vitrinite reflectance using data-driven approaches in the Persian Gulf region.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of acid fracture conductivity stands as a pivotal aspect of petroleum engineering, offering a well-established technique to amplify production rates in carbonate reservoirs. This research delves into the intricate dynamics influencing the conductivity of acid fractures, particularly under varying closure stresses and in diverse rock formations. The conductivity of acid fractures is intricately interconnected with the dissolution of rock, etching patterns on fracture surfaces, rock strength, and closure stress. To accurately predict fracture conductivity under different closure stresses, a robust model is necessary. This model involves assessing both the baseline fracture conductivity under zero closure stress and the rate of conductivity variation as closure stress fluctuates. Key among the influential factors affecting fracture conductivity is the type of rock within the reservoir. Understanding and predicting the behavior of different formations under disparate closure stresses poses a significant challenge, as does deciphering the diverse effects of treatment parameters such as acid injection rate and strength on fracture conductivity. In this study, the predictive power of XGBoost, a machine learning algorithm, was explored in assessing acid fracture conductivity in dolomite and limestone formations. The findings revealed XGBoost's ability to outperform previous studies in predicting fracture conductivity in both types of formations. Notably, it exhibited superior accuracy in forecasting fracture conductivity under varying treatment conditions, underscoring its robustness and versatility. The research underscores the pivotal role of closure stress, dissolution rate of rock (DREC), and rock strength in influencing fracture conductivity. By integrating these parameters into the design of acid fracturing operations, accurate predictions can be achieved, allowing for the optimization of treatment designs. This study illuminates the potential of XGBoost in optimizing acid fracturing treatments, ultimately bolstering well productivity in carbonate reservoirs. Furthermore, it advocates for the essential nature of separate modeling and analysis based on rock types to comprehend and optimize fracturing processes. The comparison between dolomite and limestone formations unveiled distinct conductivity behaviors, underlining the significance of tailored analyses based on rock type for precise operational optimization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.