Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182657›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Preliminary study of the effect of low-intensity focused ultrasound on postpartum uterine involution and breast pain in puerperal women: a randomised controlled trial.

Dongmei Wei, Jun Yue, Jian Meng, Jing Gao, Lei Yang, Xiaoyu Niu, Zhijian Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongmei WeiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jun YueDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Jian MengDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jing GaoDepartment of Medicine, LIFU Research Institute, Chengdu, China.
Lei YangDepartment of Medicine, LIFU Research Institute, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoyu NiuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. hxfeynxy@163.com.
Zhijian WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. wzjnfyy@163.com.
Sichuan University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2009100Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2019YFS0008Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program No.2023NSFSC1606Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program No.2023YFG0128Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program No.2023YFQ0070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) therapy in facilitating fundus descent and relieving postpartum breast pain compared with sham treatment. A multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled, blinded trial was conducted. A cohort of 176 eligible participants, who had normal prenatal check-ups and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were recruited from three medical centres and subsequently randomized into either the LIFU or sham group. All participants received three treatment sessions, wherein LIFU signal was applied to the uterus and breast sites using coupling gel, with the absence of ultrasound signal output in the sham group. Fundal height measurement and breast pain score were performed after each treatment. The primary outcome, uterine involution, was presented by measuring the fundal height of the uterus. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, as a secondary outcome, was used to assess breast pain and determine the correlation between breast pain and fundal height as the outcome simultaneously. All participants were randomly assigned to either the LIFU group (n = 88) or sham group (n = 88), with seven individuals not completing the treatment. Overall, a statistically significant difference was noted in the rate and index of fundus descent after each treatment. The rate and index of fundus descent showed greater significance following the second treatment (rate: 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) cm/d; index: 0.15 (0.1, 0.18), P < 0.001) and third treatment (rate: 1.67 (1.33, 2.0) cm/d; index: 0.26 (0.23, 0.3), P < 0.001) in the LIFU group. VAS scores, which were based on the continuous variables for the baseline, first, second, and third treatments in the LIFU group (2.0 (2.0, 3.0), 1.0 (0.0, 2.0), 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), and 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) points, respectively), and the sham group (2.0 (2.0, 2.0), 2.0 (1.0, 2.0), 2.0 (1.0, 3.0), and 3.0 (1.0, 3.0) points, respectively), showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Meanwhile, the discrepancies in VAS score classification variables between the two groups were statistically significant. After the third treatment, a notable correlation was observed between the VAS score decrease and fundus descent rate; the more the VAS score decreased, the faster was the fundal decline rate in the LIFU group. LIFU therapy is safe and effective, contributing to the acceleration of uterine involution and the relief of postpartum breast pain.Trial ID The study has registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100049586) at 05/08/2021.

Indexed as

MastodyniaAbomasumAccelerationAnimalsBreastFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38182657
PMCPMC10770318
OpenAlexW4390618611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.