Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Online monitoring of phytate content in plant residuals during wet-treatment.

Niklas Widderich, Paul Bubenheim, Andreas Liese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niklas WidderichInstitute of Technical Biocatalysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. niklas.widderich@tuhh.de.
Paul BubenheimInstitute of Technical Biocatalysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas LieseInstitute of Technical Biocatalysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. liese@tuhh.de.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt AZ 34976-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of organically bound phosphorus (P) as phytate in plant-based feeding material is a challenge for livestock farming due to limited utilization during the digestion by the animal. Its excretion into the environment through the manure pathway, poses a challenge, due to increased eutrophication and restrictions for P. Hence, while the routine supplementation of phytase enzymes in monogastric diets is common practice, metabolically triggering endogenous plant enzymes by wet-treatment prior to feeding can also lead to a better utilization of phytate bound P and increased digestibility by the animal. Nonetheless, traditional quantification of residual phytate content in plant material is both labor- and chemical-intense. The aim of this study is, therefore, to predict the remaining phytate content during wet-treatment through a straightforward and flexible methodological approach based on real-time analysis. For this, rye bran is used as a model substrate. A partial least squares regression algorithm relates the infrared spectra to the concentrations and predict the amount of P species that are transferred from the bran matrix to the liquid phase. By applying a mass balance for P and considering the effect of water compression, the amount of residual phytate content in rye bran at different time points of wet-treatment is determined. Results are compared to wet chemical methods, resulting in a RMSEP of 0.28 g

Indexed as

6-PhytasePhytic AcidAgricultureAlgorithmsAnimalsFood6-PhytasePhytic Acid

Identifiers

PMID38182617
PMCPMC10770134
OpenAlexW4390615546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.