ArticleScientific reports2024
DDCNN-F: double decker convolutional neural network 'F' feature fusion as a medical image classification framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An attention based optimized network for the classification of skin lesions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimization method for TDI-CCD image noise suppression based on improved transformer algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Kidney cancer diagnosis and surgery selection by double decker convolutional neural network from CT scans combined with great wall construction algorithm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- NextGen lung disease diagnosis with explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Semi-supervised GAN with hybrid regularization and evolutionary hyperparameter tuning for accurate melanoma detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Skin Lesion Classification Through Test Time Augmentation and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermoscopy: Enhancing Diagnosis to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Skin Lesions.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is a severe skin cancer that involves abnormal cell development. This study aims to provide a new feature fusion framework for melanoma classification that includes a novel 'F' Flag feature for early detection. This novel 'F' indicator efficiently distinguishes benign skin lesions from malignant ones known as melanoma. The article proposes an architecture that is built in a Double Decker Convolutional Neural Network called DDCNN future fusion. The network's deck one, known as a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), finds difficult-to-classify hairy images using a confidence factor termed the intra-class variance score. These hirsute image samples are combined to form a Baseline Separated Channel (BSC). By eliminating hair and using data augmentation techniques, the BSC is ready for analysis. The network's second deck trains the pre-processed BSC and generates bottleneck features. The bottleneck features are merged with features generated from the ABCDE clinical bio indicators to promote classification accuracy. Different types of classifiers are fed to the resulting hybrid fused features with the novel 'F' Flag feature. The proposed system was trained using the ISIC 2019 and ISIC 2020 datasets to assess its performance. The empirical findings expose that the DDCNN feature fusion strategy for exposing malignant melanoma achieved a specificity of 98.4%, accuracy of 93.75%, precision of 98.56%, and Area Under Curve (AUC) value of 0.98. This study proposes a novel approach that can accurately identify and diagnose fatal skin cancer and outperform other state-of-the-art techniques, which is attributed to the DDCNN 'F' Feature fusion framework. Also, this research ascertained improvements in several classifiers when utilising the 'F' indicator, resulting in the highest specificity of + 7.34%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.