Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38182575›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

MENDER: fast and scalable tissue structure identification in spatial omics data.

Zhiyuan Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Decoding Spatial Heterogeneity and Multi-Omics Regulation with Hierarchical Graph Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer therapy resistance from a spatial-omics perspective.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhiyuan YuanInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, MOE Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Center for Medical Research and Innovation, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China. zhiyuan@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-4236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue structure identification is a crucial task in spatial omics data analysis, for which increasingly complex models, such as Graph Neural Networks and Bayesian networks, are employed. However, whether increased model complexity can effectively lead to improved performance is a notable question in the field. Inspired by the consistent observation of cellular neighborhood structures across various spatial technologies, we propose Multi-range cEll coNtext DEciphereR (MENDER), for tissue structure identification. Applied on datasets of 3 brain regions and a whole-brain atlas, MENDER, with biology-driven design, offers substantial improvements over modern complex models while automatically aligning labels across slices, despite using much less running time than the second-fastest. MENDER's identification power allows the uncovering of previously overlooked spatial domains that exhibit strong associations with brain aging. MENDER's scalability makes it freely appliable on a million-level brain spatial atlas. MENDER's discriminative power enables the differentiation of breast cancer patient subtypes obscured by single-cell analysis.

Indexed as

AgingBreast NeoplasmsBayes TheoremBrainBreastFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID38182575
PMCPMC10770058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.