ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025
Evaluation of RADIANCE Monte Carlo algorithm for treatment planning in electron based Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IOERT).
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental evaluation of an intraoperative-imaging based workflow for electron beam radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer using in situ dosimetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo perform experimental as well as independent Monte Carlo (MC) evaluation of the MC algorithm implemented in RADIANCE version 4.0.8, a dedicated treatment planning system (TPS) for 3D electron dose calculations in intraoperative radiation therapy (IOERT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MOBETRON 2000 (IntraOp Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) IOERT accelerator was employed. PDD and profiles for five cylindrical plastic applicators with 50-90 mm diameter and 0°, 30° beveling were measured in a water phantom, at nominal energies of 6, 9 and 12 MeV. Additional PDD measurements were performed for all the energies without applicator. MC modeling of the MOBETRON was performed with the user code BEAMnrc and egs_chamber of the MC simulation toolkit EGSnrc. The generated phase space files of the two 0°-bevel applicators (50 mm, 80 mm) and three energies in both RADIANCE and BEAMnrc, were used to determine PDD and profiles in various set-ups of virtual water phantoms with air and bone inhomogeneities. 3D dose distributions were also calculated in image data sets of an anthropomorphic tissue-equivalent pelvis phantom. Image acquisitions were realized with a CT scanner (Philips Big Bore CT, Netherlands). Gamma analysis was applied to quantify the deviations of the RADIANCE calculations to the measurements and EGSnrc calculations. Gamma criteria normalized to the global maximum were investigated between 2%, 2 mm and 3%, 3 mm.
resultsRADIANCE MC calculations satisfied the gamma criteria of 3%, 3 mm with a tolerance limit of 85% passing rate compared to in- water phantom measurements, except for the dose profiles of the 30° beveled applicators. Mismatches lay in surface doses, in umbra regions and in the beveled end of the 30° applicators. A very good agreement to the EGSnrc calculations in heterogeneous media was observed. Deviations were more pronounced for the larger applicator diameter and higher electron energy. In 3D dose comparisons in the anthropomorphic phantom, gamma passing rates were higher than 96 % for both simulated applicators.
conclusionsRADIANCE MC algorithm agrees within 3%, 3 mm criteria with in-water phantom measurements and EGSnrc MC dose distributions in heterogeneous media for 0°-bevel applicators. The user should be aware of missing scattering components and the 30° beveled applicators should be used with attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.