Observational studyMedicine2024
Comparative analysis of doublet chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Observational study in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metal-based molecules in the treatment of cancer: From bench to bedside.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among all gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer is the predominant cause of mortality. Hence, various chemotherapy protocols have been established for managing metastatic ovarian cancer cases. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of dual chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in patients diagnosed with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. This was a retrospective observational study. Data on the clinical, pathological, radiological, and treatment characteristics of the patients were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted. Data of a total of 198 patients with a median follow-up duration of 18.7 months after bevacizumab treatment were analyzed. Serous carcinoma was found to be the most common pathological subtype in the analyzed patients, accounting for 85.8% of all cases. In total, 46.5% (n = 92), 38.4% (n = 76) and 15.2% (n = 30) patients had received gemcitabine plus carboplatin, paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC), and gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with bevacizumab, respectively. The complete response rate was 18.7%, partial response rate was 56.1%, stable disease rate was 6.6%, and progressive disease rate was 18.7%. The patients received bevacizumab treatment at a median of 9 cycles and doublet chemotherapy at a median of 7 cycles. The median progression-free survival was 11.9 (95% CI: 9.2-14.5) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 (95% CI: 19.9-29.4) months. The results showed that a history of surgery prior to bevacizumab treatment was a significant factor affecting OS (P = .006). Patients who had received gemcitabine plus carboplatin with bevacizumab (28 months) had significantly better OS than patients who had received paclitaxel plus carboplatin (20.1 months) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (17 months) (P = .009). Doublet chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab are safe and effective against recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin with bevacizumab was superior to other treatment regimens in terms of OS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.