ArticleMedicine2024
Anticoagulation dosage strategy therapy, length of stay, and all-cause mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Article in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies examined several anticoagulation (AC) dosage strategy therapies for various outcomes among coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, this AC dosage strategy therapy has not been investigated to assess the length of stay (LOS) and all-cause mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), especially in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association of AC dosage strategy therapy with the LOS and all-cause mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. We enrolled 170 patients aged 18 years or older, had a confirmed COVID-19, and were hospitalized in a tertiary care facility in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia between March 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021. Patients (n = 56) who received Enoxaparin at a dose of less than or equal to 5000 units of unfractionated heparin thrice daily were categorized as receiving a "prophylaxis" dose. Patients (n = 114) who received a therapeutic dose but not a prophylaxis dose were categorized as receiving a "therapeutic dose." The 30-day ICU LOS was the main outcome, while all-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. The covariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that the therapeutic dose was significantly associated with a 1.74-fold longer ICU LOS and 6.60-fold greater mortality risk than the prophylaxis dose. Critically ill COVID-19 patients who received the therapeutic dose had a longer ICU LOS and higher mortality than those who received the prophylaxis dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.