Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38181035›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review.

Jonathan Zhen Liang, Donovan Kai Wei Ng, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Mac Yu Kai Teo, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Jun Kiat Lua, Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong, Andrew Vimal Vijayan, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid and 9 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jonathan Zhen LiangYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Donovan Kai Wei NgYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Vijayprasanth RaveendranYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mac Yu Kai TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Elaine Li Ying QuahYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Keith Zi Yuan ChuaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jun Kiat LuaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jasmine Lerk Juan OwyongDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew Vimal VijayanDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nur Amira Binte Abdul HamidDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ting Ting YeohDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng Koon OngDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Gillian Li Gek PhuaDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-6869
Warren FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Crystal LimMedical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Natalie WoongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Simon Yew Kuang OngDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Lalit Kumar Radha KrishnaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-8644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolving individual, contextual, organizational, interactional and sociocultural factors have complicated efforts to shape the professional identity formation (PIF) of medical students or how they feel, act and think as professionals. However, an almost exclusive reliance on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic offers a unique opportunity to study the elemental structures that shape PIF and the environmental factors nurturing it. We propose two independent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA)s to map accounts of online learning environment and netiquette that structure online programs. The data accrued was analysed using the clinically evidenced Krishna-Pisupati Model of Professional Identity Formation (KPM) to study the evolving concepts of professional identity. The results of each SSR in SEBA were evaluated separately with the themes and categories identified in the Split Approach combined to create richer and deeper 'themes/categories' using the Jigsaw Perspective. The 'themes/categories' from each review were combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion. The 'themes/categories' identified from the 141 included full-text articles in the SSR in SEBA of online programs were the content and effects of online programs. The themes/categories identified from the 26 included articles in the SSR in SEBA of netiquette were guidelines, contributing factors, and implications. The Funnelling Process identified online programs (encapsulating the content, approach, structures and the support mechanisms); their effects; and PIF development that framed the domains guiding the discussion. This SSR in SEBA identifies the fundamental elements behind developing PIF including a structured program within a nurturing environment confined with netiquette-guided boundaries akin to a Community of Practice and the elemental aspect of a socialisation process within online programs. These findings ought to be applicable beyond online training and guide the design, support and assessment of efforts to nurture PIF.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceStudents, MedicalHumansPandemicsSocial Identification

Identifiers

PMID38181035
PMCPMC10769105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.