ArticlePloS one2024
Psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A quantitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of fear of recurrence and progression on mental health after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: the role of illness uncertainty.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2026Article
- From Challenges to Solutions: Patient Insights Inform Psychological Intervention Design After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Measure of Psychological Distress After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: The Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Distress Inventory.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Supporting Emotional Recovery After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Development and Pilot Testing an Online Facilitated Support-Group Program.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: dissecting an underdiagnosed problem.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): Unveiling the Enigma of the Unexpected Coronary Event.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology and Public Health Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Remotely delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for spontaneous coronary artery dissection survivors.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current Knowledge, Research Gaps, and Innovative Research Initiatives:JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Review
- Correction: Psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A quantitative study.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent studies suggest that acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) carries significant psychosocial burden. This survey-based quantitative study builds on our earlier qualitative investigation of the psychosocial impacts of SCAD in Australian SCAD survivors. The study aimed to document the prevalence and predictors of a broad range of psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of SCAD.
methodAustralian SCAD survivors currently enrolled in the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute genetics study were invited to participate in an online survey to assess the psychosocial impacts of SCAD. Participants completed a questionnaire, developed using findings from our earlier qualitative research, which assessed 48 psychosocial and five lifestyle impacts of SCAD. Participants also provided demographic and medical data and completed validated measures of anxiety and depression.
resultsOf 433 SCAD survivors invited to participate, 310 (72%) completed the questionnaire. The most common psychosocial impacts were 'shock about having a heart attack' (experienced by 87% respondents), 'worry about having another SCAD' (81%), 'concern about triggering another SCAD' (77%), 'uncertainty about exercise and physical activity' (73%) and 'confusion about safe levels of activity and exertion' (73.0%) and 'being overly aware of bodily sensations' (73%). In terms of lifestyle impacts, the SCAD had impacted on work capacity for almost two thirds of participants, while one in ten had sought financial assistance. The key predictors of psychosocial impacts were being under 50, current financial strain, and trade-level education. The key predictors of lifestyle impacts were being over 50, SCAD recurrence, trade-level education, and current financial strain. All psychosocial impacts and some lifestyle impacts were associated with increased risk of anxiety and/or depression. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This quantitative study extends our previous qualitative investigation by documenting the prevalence of each of 48 psychosocial and five lifestyle impacts identified in our earlier focus group research, and by providing risk factors for greater SCAD impacts. The findings suggest the need for supports to address initial experiences of shock, as well as fears and uncertainties regarding the future, including SCAD recurrence and exercise resumption. Support could be targeted to those with identified risk factors. Strategies to enable SCAD survivors to remain in or return to the paid workforce are also indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.