ArticlePloS one2024
SVvalidation: A long-read-based validation method for genomic structural variation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted next-generation sequencing for copy number variation detection: Recent progress in clinical oncology.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although various methods have been developed to detect structural variations (SVs) in genomic sequences, few are used to validate these results. Several commonly used SV callers produce many false positive SVs, and existing validation methods are not accurate enough. Therefore, a highly efficient and accurate validation method is essential. In response, we propose SVvalidation-a new method that uses long-read sequencing data for validating SVs with higher accuracy and efficiency. Compared to existing methods, SVvalidation performs better in validating SVs in repeat regions and can determine the homozygosity or heterozygosity of an SV. Additionally, SVvalidation offers the highest recall, precision, and F1-score (improving by 7-16%) across all datasets. Moreover, SVvalidation is suitable for different types of SVs. The program is available at https://github.com/nwpuzhengyan/SVvalidation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.